rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Harper still has not answered the toughest question on the Senate affair

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

One piece of the constantly unfolding Senate/PMO scandal has the communications whizzes in the PMO coaching Senator Mike Duffy in a lie about the now notorious $90,000 payment.

Duffy was to say he borrowed the money from a bank. It actually came from the Prime Minister’s Chief of Staff. (Or, so we are told. Canadians have not, in fact, seen the cheque.)

Giving politicians "media lines" is what communications people are paid to do, and they do it just about every day.

On Tuesday, the same gang that coached Duffy seemed to be at it again.

On the face of it, the PMO communications mavens appear to be the authors of these -- written, prepared -- words that Government Senate Leader Claude Carignan carefully read right after the vote to suspend Duffy, Wallin and Brazeau.

"The misconduct of these three Senators called for firm action and that is what we have taken. Unfortunately, Trudeau’s Liberals continue to defend the status quo and condone the action of these senators. We will look forward to now focussing on priorities that matter to Canadians, including jobs, economic growth and long-term prosperity."

The 49 year old former small town mayor looked none too comfortable parroting these obviously prepared lines.

But he did as he was bidden, as did most of his colleagues when it came to the vote.

An unprecedented move, with no due process

We cannot know what kind of dangerous precedent that vote might have set. What is clear is that the sanctions imposed on the three Senators were based on no clear Senate rules, and that suspensions of this sort have never before occurred in the entire history of Canada.

Plus, what we’re dealing with here are not really suspensions. They are, in effect, expulsions.

The Senate news release announcing the votes says: "They [the three Senators] are suspended until such time as the suspension is rescinded."

After the vote, lonely Conservative dissenter Senator Hugh Segal explained what that means: "In order for [Wallin, Duffy and Brazeau] to be returned, you’d have to have another motion in this place under a subsection of the thing that passed, and I think the numbers that we now have are quite indicative of where that would be. So I think this is essentially an expulsion with no pay..."

Segal says he fought the good fight and lost, but remains deeply concerned about the lack of due process.

"In every single judicial process we have -- administrative, labour relations -- there’s always a right of appeal," Segal told reporters. "This was a decision that had no right of appeal..."

Harper is still the central figure

Few Canadians may be moved by Segal’s concern for due process, or by Senator Roméo Dallaire’s fear of the dangerous precedent this arbitrary action sets.

The Official Opposition NDP will definitely not waste any political capital fretting about the shabby treatment meted out to three unelected members of a chamber they seek to abolish.

But nor will the NDP want Canadians to think the scandal is all over now.

The Party will still seek to dig out the truth about the Prime Minister’s involvement, especially in the protracted discussions and negotiations with Mike Duffy that led to the $90,000 debacle.

If the RCMP, or anyone else, can establish that over-eager PMO communications minions actually advised a sitting Senator to lie, and aided and abetted him in that lie, it is hard to imagine such information would not severely damage Stephen Harper.

Duffy has said there is an email trail that backs up his story. But as interesting as the emails he released last week are, they do not deal with the coaching-to-lie part of the story.

Until emails about the PMO’s involvement in that lie, or some other damning information, come to light, the Opposition will be shadow-boxing with the Prime Minister.

From here on in, Harper’s line will be that the three Senators have received their just deserts, despite the best efforts of the Trudeau Liberals to thwart that justice. Now, he will be free to say, it is time to get on to more important business.

The fact is, though, that Harper was the originator, the Prime Mover, of the whole affair.

He is the one who appointed two Senators who did not live in the provinces they were to represent.

He did it knowingly and in flagrant defiance of the law and the Canadian Constitution.

Opposition members, especially NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair, have put lots of tough and probing questions to the Prime Minister.

There is one question, however, they have not yet tried, and it is a very basic one:

Could the Prime Minister explain why he appointed Mike Duffy and Pamela Wallin to the Senate to represent P.E.I. and Saskatchewan when he knew they both lived in Ontario?

The BNA Act requires that a Senator be a resident of the province he or she represents, and the Prime Minister has said that Senator Duffy, for example, was wrong to charge expenses for his Ottawa home because he is a fulltime resident of Ottawa not P.E.I.

If that is true, how could the Prime Minister ever have considered Mike Duffy to be a resident of P.E.I. -- or Pamela Wallin of Saskatchewan -- for the purpose of occupying a Senate seat?

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.