rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Activist Communiqué

Krystalline Kraus's picture
Krystalline Kraus is an intrepid journalist and veteran reporter for rabble.ca since its 2001 beginnings. She needs neither a red cape nor safety goggles to fly into her latest political assignment. She often live-tweets from events -- almost exclusively First Nations and environmental issues. You can follow her on Twitter @krystalline_k.

Activist Communiqué: Re-Occupy my heart?

| June 12, 2012
Activist Communiqué: Re-Occupy my heart?

Over and over again, I hear that the Occupy movement in Canada is having a hard time getting over the fact that a long-term encampment may just not be possible right now -- due to 2011's legal crackdown on Occupy encampments taking up public and private space -- and how to still utilize the spirit behind Occupy as we move into summer 2012.

Occupy is more than just holding physical space; its tactic and purpose is to facilitate the 99 per cent in shining a light on the actions of the one per cent.

The movement and tactic just needs to be reimagined in new and relevant ways.

Perhaps shorter-term occupations as a tool to bring attention to the actions of one per cent corporations?

Perhaps community hubs for Occupy Free School classes and the Occupy People's Library?

Perhaps more OccupyTalks workshops on relevant social justice issues?

Perhaps all three and more?

Occupy Toronto and Occupy Vancouver both, for example, get lots of requests to do joint actions with other social justice groups. This is neither a good nor bad thing that Occupy provides the logistical framework for other groups to model.

We saw this in Toronto with the first Quebec student solidarity protest which was co-hosted by Occupy Toronto using a General Assembly decision-making model.

After all, there is a strong activist lineage at play here. The Arab and African spring gave way to the Occupy movement which now is helping fuel the #Maplespread movement in Canada.

Occupy Toronto has also been asked to participate in marches and help No One Is Illegal occupy and shut down MPP offices to protest Bill C-31.

Also, Occupy Toronto had a successful 24 occupation as part of Toronto's larger May Day celebrations this year and held Simcoe Park to protest Barrick Gold. This success can work as a model for further short-term, targeted occupation spaces.

All this said, there are still Occupy purists out there who kick and scream that Occupy cannot/should not even exist if it cannot hold down a long-term encampment

And we as a movement have been frankly bogged down in that debate for too long instead of focusing on our new capacity to work with other groups and take on the one per cent without being utterly consumed with the amount of energy and work it took to run a camp.

In the fall of 2011, Occupy couldn't really do any political projects or networking because our encampments were under constant police threat and the sheer logistics of running the camps took all our efforts/energy.

I know the movement caught a lot of flak for this and there were many people in the camp who did want to do major actions into the financial district and work with other social movements but holding down the fort became the first and only priority.

I feel part of this problem was caused by our own success. Many people were skeptical of Occupy's ability to hold down a camp for even one night, so when the nights continued, organizers were caught off guard by the sheer amount of work it would take to maintain and uphold that success.

Because, let's face it, while the camp was awesome, it took a whole lot of effort just to hold down a long-term encampment with the constant fear of police eviction, worrying about having enough food to feed everyone at the camp, escalations between different individuals and negotiating between different political tendencies.

From all that I have seen this spring, having Occupy move beyond the pure long-term encampment as a tactic has to be done for its own sake and because community groups and other social justice movements are asking this of Occupy.

This is starting to happen, slowly.

With this further integration of Occupy into the mainstream, Occupy Toronto has teamed up with the Maple Spring and student strikers, regarding how -- if passed -- Bill C-309 will make wearing masks illegal at demonstrations. The same is true of how Occupy Vancouver has teamed up with anti-tanker activists in B.C. and those opposed to the tar sands.

Exposing one per cent targets for how they are destroying the banking system and the environment, keeping watch on Harper and the election fraud scandal, is going to be a big job.

Occupy and the narrative of the 99 per cent is already embedded in these issues through more than just Occupy endorsing or jointly planning actions around these concerns.

In fact, the narrative of the 99 per cent is intrinsic to these very issues themselves now that Occupy has radically changed the political landscape in North America.

The movement is bigger than just Occupy-as-camp since Occupy itself is bigger than just a desire to camp. They've already occupied space in the fall, now they're looking to Occupy political dialogue and target those who seek to destroy the lives of the 99 per cent.

The question remains how Occupy will move forward. Discussions are underway every Monday at their 7:00 p.m. General Assemblies at Cloud Gardens (on Richmond Street between Yonge Street and Bay Street) and during Occupy Free Skule Sundays in the park.

If you have an idea how Occupy Toronto can move forward, please attend the GAs and get involved.

I promise you it's going to be OK if Occupy evolves, you can't stay a caterpillar forever!

embedded_video

Comments

I think I understand roughly where you're coming from Kristalline. Here's my arm-chair perspective.

Alot of folks involved in Occupy as citizens rather than dedicated activist organisers, miss the encampment. Not because it wasn't work, or full of plenty of social and logistical challenges, but because for the first time in history (in our lifetimes) we created a space for people from diverse backgrounds to come together and speak openly and honestly with one another about what we feel are both the problems and solutions we as human beings on this planet must regard seriously. It has yet to be demonstrated how now or in the past, this type of space has ever been created for such a wide base of society, by simply having more marches. Don't get me wrong, marches are (occasionally) great at drawing public attention to specific issues which are heartfelt for particular groups of individuals. However, when it comes to creating space for a much much wider swath of citizens to assemble and simply discuss the issues of the day as a group, hours of dragging sore feet and hoarse voices down the street, don't cut it.

Secondly, if we as the 99% are distinguished by our relative lack of monetary resources as compared to the 1%, who do you feel is more representative of that, the homeless person who can't do anything valuable for his/her community due to this economic barrier, or the university educated middle class activist who can go home to have mom and dad do their laundry and cook nice meals for them? Activists are absolutely important and essential to make this movement a success, but it's very important (to me) not to loose sight of why we're doing this, and who we're doing this for. Is it for one specific issue, like Barrick Gold or countless other glaring pox on the soul of our nation, or is it to elevate the lowest of our so called 99% and begin to treat them once again as valued human beings and members of community, where their voices, just like our own, can be spoken and listened to on an equal platform?

For the above reasons, I disagree that it's time to move on from Occupy encampments. I say we should not allow the authorities to continue to dictate the terms of our peaceful assemblies, or for how long we Occupy a given space. To do otherwise is to concede that what they are doing is acceptable. It's gutless. The folks who *continue* to occupy on the streets, and proclaim proudly the principals which brought us together, they are the real heroes. We should be raising them up on our shoulders through the streets, not dismantling the paltry little support which we've thus far been able to provide them.

Login or register to post comments