rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Dear Ryan: Conservative climate change strategy

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Ryan Leef

Member of Parliament for Yukon

Open Letter #24

Dear Ryan,

This month the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reported that CO2 levels in the atmosphere had passed the 400 parts per million level citing studies done by scientists on Mauna Loa in Hawaii. 

When speaking about climate change, the tipping point is when effects put into motion now are such that the consequences are irreversible. Former NASA scientist, James E. Hansen believes that we passed the tipping point in 2008 when the CO2 level reached 385 ppm. How bad will it be? Scientists don’t make absolute statements and are conservative in their predictions. However, they are very worried. The 2007 predictions for ice free summers in the Arctic Ocean were for 2050. Now they predict we might see this within the next decade. Already Island countries such as the Maldives are being inundated as oceans rise. Desertification of the Sahel area of Africa is increasing even as Canada becomes the only country to withdraw from the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification. In Canada, southern Alberta may become unfit for agriculture having an arid climate already and rivers that are all fed by glaciers. 

That the southern Alberta farming community is solidly Conservative only goes to show how easy it is to convince people to vote against their own best interests.

James E. Hansen had a public spat with Natural Resource Minister Joe Oliver this year. Mr. Hansen said that it was madness to develop all of the unconventional oil, including tar sands bitumen. Mr. Oliver said that Mr. Hansen’s warnings were "exaggerated" and "inexcusable." Mr. Hansen said that the Conservative government was "Neanderthal," a comment I disagree with given that there is no science to indicate that Neanderthals were knuckle dragging, environment destroying idiots. 

Smoke and mirrors! That is what Elizabeth May said about our government’s strategy to deal with climate change. 

The Conservative government has reluctantly conceded that the future health of our planet depends on reduction of Green House Gases (GHG). This March, Environment Minister Peter Kent boasted to Canadians that we were "half-way" to meeting our Copenhagen Accord targets for emission reductions of 607 Mtonnes CO2eq which are 17 per cent less than our 2005 levels. This claim was echoed by Heritage Minister James Moore and other Conservatives.

Yet Environment Canada released a report this year which showed that our emissions in 2020 will be 720 Mtonnes CO2eq. Former Environment Commissioner Scott Vaughan reported, "It is unlikely that enough time is left to develop and establish regulations that together will contribute sufficient GHG reductions to meet the 2020 target." According to the Pembina Institute, the only possible way Canada could meet our commitments is "if the government imposes severe restrictions on oil sands mining and upgrading."   

So Ryan, what’s with "half-way there"? 

There are two possible explanations. One is that Conservatives sincerely believe that we will meet our commitments without taking any action at all. Could "half-way there" be wishful thinking? It is unnerving to entertain the notion that our nation’s leaders might be delusional.

The second possibility is that the Conservative government has sold out to the fossil fuel industry. If that were the case, we would see publicly funded advertisements promoting the tar sands as "ethical" and "green." Wherever they could, the government would funnel public money into the oil sector through subsidies and deflected government programs once dedicated to serving the nation. Critics would be branded as "terrorists" and "radicals" while information would be stifled, laboratories shut down and scientists muzzled. A corrupt government would endeavour to deceive the public about climate change, perhaps with smoke and mirrors.

If either of these scenarios is accurate then our government is unfit. Reassure me Ryan. Please explain "half-way there."

Perhaps there is a third explanation. Perhaps the Conservative Party members are undereducated in the discipline of science.  As you have discovered recently, ignorance is neither an excuse nor bliss.

Earlier this month, a group of Canadian scientists sent a letter to Joe Oliver offering to explain to him the science behind climate change.  You should try to attend.

May you walk on the high road.

Respectfully yours,

Linda Leon

Linda Leon is an artist living in Whitehorse, Yukon.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.