The throne speech should have been the most important political news of the last few days but, not surprisingly, the Harper government came up with almost nothing. To be sure, there were more hints about handing the economy over the U.S. -- what passes for economic policy from a man enamored with unregulated U.S. capitalism. More free trade, opening up telecom and other areas to foreign investment, pushing P3s (public private partnerships) and reinforcing his commitment to the next phases of corporate tax cuts. He will re-introduce his crime bills in their original form and now count on his plurality in the senate to get through un-amended.
But more important, as they are reminders of the depressing deadlock Canadian democracy finds itself in, were statements from Michael Ignatieff and Harper's right hand man, Jason Kenney. The first reminds us of why we never, ever want Ignatieff to have a majority government. The latter reminds us of how totally corrupt the current government is -- a government of liars who use the political authority given to them to pursue their own personal agendas, the law and integrity be damned.
Ignatieff distinguished himself with a truly despicable diatribe about Israeli Apartheid Week -- denouncing it as anti-Semitism and using the same offensive intimidation tactics used by B'nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress against any criticism of Israel.
He wrote (on behalf of the Liberal Party): "[Israeli Apartheid Week] is part of a global campaign of calls for divestment, boycotts and proclamations, and it should be condemned unequivocally and absolutely. Apartheid is defined, in international law, as a crime against humanity. Israeli Apartheid Week is a deliberate attempt to portray the Jewish state as criminal.
The very premise of Israeli Apartheid Week runs counters to our shared values of mutual respect and tolerance, regardless of nationality, race or creed."
Except that, in fact, Israel is an Apartheid state and has been so described by none other than its most decorated soldier, its current defence minister, and former Prime Minister, Ehud Barak. He stated recently:
"As long as in this territory west of the Jordan river there is only one political entity called Israel it is going to be either non-Jewish, or non-democratic,... If this bloc of millions of Palestinians cannot vote, that will be an apartheid state."
Advertising
Ignatieff's disingenuous condemnation of Israeli Apartheid Week should remind everyone that this is the same man who gave loud and unequivocal support for the invasion of Iraq and didn't change his mind for years. The same man who condones torture. This ethically challenged, dishonest politician does not deserve to be prime minister.
As for Jason Kenney nothing he says or does in terms of manipulating and lying to the public should surprise us. The Canadian Press through Access to Information, ferreted out emails from his department that reveal he intervened in the preparation of a new guide for Canadian immigrants to excise any reference to the fact that discrimination against gays and lesbians is illegal in this country.
After the original reference was removed on Kenney's orders, Neil Yeates, his deputy minister recommended putting it back in:
"Recommend the re-insertion of the text boxes related to ... the decriminalization of homosexual sex/recognition of same-sex marriage," says a memorandum to Mr. Kenney said Yeates. Kenny rejected the advice.
But when the gay-rights group Egale Canada met with Kenney last December after learning the booklet made no reference to gay and lesbian rights, he told them gay rights had been "overlooked" when the guide was being prepared.
In other words, he lied. Just as he did in reference to the elimination of the budget for KAIROS. This despicable man has no right to sit in the House of Commons.

I'm amazed that people who quote Barak about apartheid state seem to be willfully blind to language even in the brief quote they use and seem to ignore the context. On the other hand, I shouldn't be amazed, it's behaviour common to ideologues. Barak said "WILL be an apartheid state" not IS. Barak was sensibly trying to put forward that it is absolutely necessary to work towrads the two-state solution and ensure the Palestinans have their own state rather than the position of the right-wing nuts in Israel who want a greater Israel including all of the West Bank. It is a laudible goal and is necessary to prevent Isreal from becoming an apartheid state, it is obviously not an admission that it is.
So rather than trying to read into the mind of Ignatieff and claim how something he may sincerely believe is "disingenuous", perhaps Mr. Dobbin might want to consider the disingenuous misrepresentations he makes to further his positions. The West Bank is going to be part of a Palestinian state, hopefully sooner rather than later as long as both sides can bulid trust and work towards peace. That interest is not being furthered by ideologues mainly interested in using the Palestinian cause as a means of advancing their own ideologies.
So far the IAW has done nothing more than preach to the choir, alienate many, and force many people who could normally be counted on to speak up for the Palestinians into a position where they feel they have to defend Israel. Good Work!
The West Bank is going to be part of a Palestinian state, hopefully sooner rather than later as long as both sides can bulid trust and work towards peace.
Now queue in Israel's announcement the day Biden shows up to expand settlements in occupied East Jerusalem. That sounds like building trust to me.
OK, Pensive, I'll agree, that was stupid.