If you harbour any disgust for the super rich and the courtiers who hang around them, fawn over them and serve them then there is now even more evidence to back up your assessment of the self-indulgent global elite.
Dior super-designer John Galliano (I confess I had never heard of the man til now) revealed his true character this week by making some of the most vile and stomach turning comments regarding Jews and Hitler I have seen for a while (they reminded me of First Nations chief David Ahenakew's foul rant). At two different establishments the famous Dior designer ranted viciously at other patrons, taunting them with anti-semitic venom. At one he declared "I love Hitler" and then outdoing even that offense, "People like you would be dead. Your mothers, your forefathers, would all be fucking gassed."
This was not the first incident involving this openly aggressive anti-semite. Just last week Galliano was arrested for allegedly insulting art historian Geraldine Bloch calling her a "dirty Jew face" and an "ugly, disgusting whore." He arrested for being drunk but later released.
Hopefully this execrable man will again be arrested again and charged as he can be in France for expressing such sentiments.
But his unbelievable comments reveal as much about the elite and the corporate world as they do about him. Dior initially "laid him off" a until they could investigate. Investigate what? It was all captured on a video which had gone viral and if Dior was hoping for extenuating circumstances I would love to know what they think would mitigate against the horror of his hateful outbursts.
As of this posting Dior still hasn't decided if they will cancel a Friday show by the "creative genius."
Business is business. It reminds me, too, of Ford Motor company doing business with Hitler's Germany throughout the war -- and of course his was not the only company from an allied country doing so. These are just a couple of the thousands of examples of the moral depravity of capitalism whose principal defenders seek to separate business and what it does, from society and what it is. Morality and ethics have no place in the corporate balance sheets.
Advertising
Of course corporations themselves don't speak, that is left to the executives and spokespeople (now mostly women who present a softer image). And when they decide not to speak the entourage coughs up the apologists to do the job. In this case fashion writer Jeanne Beker tweeted: "He's a creative genius and his work, in this case, must be separated from his personal p.o.v." Point of view? I wonder if Ms Beker, living in her rarefied world of obscene wealth, privilege and status, has ever even heard the phrase hate speech. It is hard to imagine a more stunning disconnect with the core values of the society Ms Beker actually lives in. It is a testament to how "separate" the ruling elite and its sycophants can become as we move inexorably into a new feudalism.
What if some creative genius had a computer full of child porn or was found to be having sex with children? Would that, too, have to be "separated" from his creative work? Galliano joins a select club worthy of a double standard along with Roman Polanski who was convicted years ago for sodomizing a 13-year-old girl whom he had drugged. He was defended by a shocking number of Hollywood figures, including one of my formerly favourite entertainers, Whoopy Goldberg, who stepped up for Polanksi when he was finally detained in Switzerland with the inspired comment: "While it wasn't rape, rape."
What the apologists are really saying is not that these "artists'" work should be separated from their behaviour, it's that their behaviour should not be judged at all because of who they are. It's the elite itself (think of all the bankers who should be in jail) who must be separated from the rest of us. This is just one result of the ever-increasing gap between the super-rich and the societies they inhabit, but don't really live in.
Galliano was defended by another ethically-challenged member of the fashion world's courtiers, model Chanel Iman who described Galliano as "caring and loving." Thank goodness for actress Natalie Portman, so far the only sane voice coming out of the entertainment business. She, who promotes Dior perfume, said she was "shocked and disgusted" and stated: "As an individual who is proud to be Jewish I will not associate with Mr. Galliano in anyway."
But surely you shouldn't have to be Jewish to denounce this man. Where is everybody else?
The media and business put these defective creatures on pedestals and tell us all to worship them. The trouble is, too many are happy to comply. Yet I don't think that casual viewers of fashion entertainment and Hollywood intend to provide these people with a pass on morality.
It will be interesting to see the final spin Dior puts on the matter. We know ahead of time that is all it will be. It will have nothing to do with what is right or wrong. It's like everything else they produce: can they sell it?

I find it interesting that a billionaire can openly rant with pride that he loves Hitler and all jews should be 'gassed' when without fear of humiliation,financial sanction or career assassination but some French diplomat gets tarred and feathered for labeling Israel as a 'shitty little country that has the world on the edge of WW3'....Not to mention anyone who dares criticize Israel.
It must be great to be obscenely wealthy and/or part of the Corporate Elite...
You get to live in a world of impunity....
I read alot of MSM news and I have read more times than most people have eaten warm meals that it is the unions who are enjoying a 'culture of entitlement'.
But I guess since MSM 'news' is owned and published by these Corporate Clowns,they are having an easy time convincing the culture of stupidity that it is unions,social activists,students and the poor who are the elite culture of entitlement.
It's not just Dior or Galliano...These super rich 'personalities' are enjoying so much impunity and freedom that every second week someone in that Club's mouth opens and roars.
And if it isn't anti-semitism,it's anti-poor,anti-liberal,anti-women,anti-freedom,anti-peace and generally anti-social.
It seems that the ancient Roman Empire is enjoying a global renaissance and if we can't entertain or provide a decadent service or security for the emperors and the rulers,there's always a place for the rest of us as feed for the lions.
Murray Dobbin might like to know that some time ago William Klein sued John Galliano for unlawfully appropriating his style of painting on contact sheets. Klein is an American expat artist who moved to France in the 50s and became associated with many Left Bank filmmakers like Chris Marker, Alain Resnais, Agnès Varda and Jean-Luc Godard - all great artists who's achievements are not only a matter of critical intelligence but great style. Klein himself produced two films on the American boxer Muhammad Ali, anticipating that Ali would become a significant political figure. Having himself worked for Vogue magazine, Klein decided to spoof the industry and the French Communication Department establishment in What's New Polly Maggoo. The film is less fashion industry bashing than an exploration of what makes the system tick - sort of like Guy Debord mixed with Angela McRobbie. To his credit Klein also made a film on Elridge Cleaver (a character he didn't like too much) and made one the most important documentaries of the May 68 student movement (which includes scenes with Daneil Cohn-Bendit in it) - Grands Soirs et Petits Matins. I would like to think that Klein's films, even if they sometimes straddle the line between fashion and politics (and never ignoring the fact that the political economy greatly determines both), might be of interest to those erstwhile "hearth and home" union workers that Jack Layton is always talking about. You know, the reformist, social democratic types who don't know much about fashion but have big hearts. Yes, and thank goodness for Natalie Portman.
Marc James Léger
I take it Murray Dobbin doesn't own any Richard Wagner recordings.