rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

What would you ask the parliamentary committee reviewing Bill C-59?

Graphic of a police figure labelled "CSE" standing with a battering ram at a computer.

The fight against the Harper-era, reckless Bill C-51 has been a longstanding one for Canadians since its introduction in 2015. After the Liberals finally introduced the overdue reforms last year, we are now at a point where these proposals, set out in the National Security Act 2017 or Bill C-59, are under review by parliamentary committee.

Bill C-59 brings some improvements to the table -- like a new pan-government review body for Canada's spy agencies and a narrower definition of "terrorist propaganda," so that the term no longer includes activities like peaceful protest and artistic expression.

However, C-59 still has many worrying gaps that keep it far from being the repeal of C-51 that thousands of Canadians called for. For instance, the legislation falls short of addressing concerns associated with information sharing and police powers for CSIS. It also makes no mention of measures to protect citizens from mass surveillance devices like Stingrays or measures to safeguard our right to encryption, which plays a key role in our digital and economic security.

What's worse, is that rather than trying to rein in our spy agency's already sweeping powers -- C-59 wants to grant CSE with even more powers to exploit hacking vulnerabilities, produce and spread misinformation, impersonate people online, and use malware and other hacking tools to mount attacks.

If you are thinking about things like the WannaCry ransomware that infected millions of computers (and that came from a leak of hacking tools gathered by the NSA), bringing down the U.K.'s National Health Service, or the Russian propaganda that influenced the U.S. elections -- this is precisely the kind of stuff we are looking at if these new powers are granted to CSE through C-59. Scary, right?

Luckily, we've still got time to stop this nightmare scenario from becoming reality. The Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security (SECU) is currently reviewing this bill and your OpenMedia team will be presenting as witnesses on February 8.

So we want to hear from you -- what would you ask or raise with the SECU committee to help fix the troubling concerns with C-59?

Drop us a comment below, post on Twitter using #TellSECU or email us at contact@openmedia.org with the subject line: Tell SECU

This is our best chance to fix this bill before it's too late and give Canadians better privacy protections -- not just a half-baked measure that the government can use to pat themselves on the back and say they "did something."

Enough is enough -- we can't let these out-of-control new spying powers we've never even been consulted on become law. Make sure to sign our petition at: https://act.openmedia.org/StopSpyPowers

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.