rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Over 42,000 Canadian voices against data caps are now on the public record at the CRTC

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

OpenMedia, with the support of over 42,000 Canadians, yesterday put on the public record our view of what the Internet can, and should, look like in Canada.  

The 50-page submission (embedded below) outlines how Canadians should have access to reasonably priced Internet both at home and on their mobile devices. An Internet where all content is treated equally, and where telecom giants don't give a hand up to already dominant content providers, like Facebook or YouTube, who are able to broker deals with telecoms for captive audiences through differential pricing (a practice known as "zero-rating").

To make this possible, OpenMedia is calling for the end of data caps. And we're not alone in this. In the U.S., Netflix has asked for regulators to declare data caps "unreasonable", wireless carrier T-Mobile just axed caps themselves, and here at home Rogers Communications has come out on the side of OpenMedia against zero-rating (though, alas, not against data caps).

Without data caps there is no incentive for Internet providers to price content differently. And after all, we pay telecoms so they can provide us access to this great creation which is the world wide web, not so they can award us a hall pass for what we can and cannot see and do on it.

Included with our submission were also 5,600 individual comments from Canadians who wrote their own suggestions on what the future of the web should be using OpenMedia's online tool (add your voice now, if you haven't already).

The report is part of a process started by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), who announced this spring they would review the big issues of zero-rating and net neutrality, and asked for public input. As well as OpenMedia, Internet service providers, academics, consumer rights groups, and even social media giant Facebook have all answered the call to help shape Canada's Internet future.

This process has a few key inflection points:

  • JUNE 28: Deadline for first submissions. OpenMedia's 43-pager can be found here, and if you want to dig deep, all reports are available here.

  • SEPT. 21: After the first deadline all parties have a chance to review each other's views and submit a response. (Our response, based on your feedback, is right here).

  • OCT. 31: In-person hearings start in Gatineau, Quebec. Parties are invited to present on their arguments and address others. The whole thing will be streamed lived on CPAC, and OpenMedia is scheduled to present on November 3.

  • NOV. 23: Final replies are due. From Bell to OpenMedia, everyone is able to reflect back on the hearing and make their final case to the CRTC. At this point, the public consultation phase ends, with the CRTC expected to take some time to consider all viewpoints and propose new rules around data caps, zero-rating, and net neutrality.

The whole process can seem a little dry, but the arguments presented represent very different views of what the Internet can, and should, be in Canada.

OpenMedia's vision of the Internet is in line with what the founders of the world wide web had in mind when the Internet was first created many years ago. In short, we want to ensure the Internet is a free and open engine for innovation that's affordable for all. Telecom giants like Bell and Telus, on the other hand, want to see an Internet that looks a lot more like cable TV, where only those with immense resources are able to reach the public, with the rest of us left struggling to share our ideas on an uneven playing field, one much more akin to your gopher-hole-filled childhood soccer field than an Olympic stadium.  

To support OpenMedia's work for a free and open Internet, add your voice to our letter to the commission, think about submitting your own comment, and spread the word to your friends on Facebook and Twitter.

The more of us that stand together, the better the chance the Internet has of being that transformative force its creators, and many of you, dream it can be.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.