rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Why vote child care in 2015: What Manitobans need to know

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: Jason Parks/flickr

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thirteen federal elections ago, in 1970, the Royal Commission on the Status of Women recommended a national child-care program. Fast-forward to 2015, and Canadian parents are more desperate than ever for affordable, quality child care.

Up to 85 per cent of all households with children have a mother in the paid labour force, making childcare an issue for nearly all young families. Canada, with its nearly 5 million children under the age of 12 years, has just under 1 million licensed regulated child-care spaces; spaces which are very unequally spread across the provinces, with varying quality and regulatory standards, at hugely unequal costs ranging from just $7/day to $75/ day. Where child-care spaces don't exist or aren't accessible, families are forced to resort to unregulated options -- from family care (often by grandparents) or unlicensed and often expensive "informal" care.

Given these realities, building a national child-care system is long overdue. Many European countries can meet or exceed the European Union targets of an early learning and care space for at least 33 percent of youngsters under three years, and 90 per cent of preschoolers. Canada, which averages out at services for 20.5 per cent of children under the age of 12, lags very far behind.

Over the past decade, the Conservative government has failed to improve child-care services and has actually made things worse. In 2006, the freshly elected Conservatives cancelled five-year agreements Ottawa had signed with each of the provinces. These bilateral agreements would transfer $5 billion to provinces to expand quality, universally inclusive, accessible and developmental child care. Over the term of the agreement, Manitoba would have received $176 million; funds it lost in what Family Services Minister Gord Mackintosh called "one of the biggest U-turns in Canadian social policy history." In the first and only year of the agreement before it was cancelled, $34 million was transferred to Manitoba, making up a full 33 per cent of our province's 2005-06 child-care budget, a sign of how important Ottawa's decisions are to Manitoba child care.

After cancelling the bilateral agreements, the Conservatives launched the misleadingly named "Universal Choice in Childcare Benefit" (UCCB), which initially provided a taxable $100/month for each child under the age of six years. In 2015, Ottawa boosted the amount to $160/month, and added $60/month for each child up to the age of 17. The cost of the UCCB will be $6.7 billion in 2015-2016. Most researchers agree that Canadians need a Family Allowance (something Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney terminated in 1992), but the UCCB is a very poor substitute. Because it is taxable, the UCCB triggers a bill at income-tax time -- on average, Canadian parents keep less than one-third of their benefit. Economic analysis shows the mechanics of the program disproportionately benefit higher over lower-income earners. Inefficient UCCB spending is compounded by another tax program, the Child Care Expense Deduction, worth $900 million in 2014-2015. Combined, the federal government will spent $7.6 billion, but none of these funds will grow childcare services or increase quality.

While the Conservatives have not directly addressed the shortage of child-care spaces, the NDP, Liberals and Green parties have all proposed a different way to help parents. Each has suggested ways the federal government can pro-actively expand the supply of spaces, increase quality, and ensure services are affordable. The NDP has proposed a five-year plan to build 1,000,000 new spaces at a maximum cost of $15/day -- doubling the national total. The Greens have proposed a universal child-care program, the reinstatement of the bilateral agreements, and prioritized workplace child care. The Liberals have said that within 100 days of forming government, they would work in partnerships with provinces, territories and Indigenous people to develop a national framework for child care.

Three of the four national parties have platforms that address the needs of working families with young children. The NDP, Liberals and Green parties envisage an engaged federal government working in partnership with provinces to build actual services. Conservatives, in contrast, prefer a hands-off fiscal policy that does nothing to grow the stock of child-care spaces.

Here in Manitoba, there are approximately 32,500 spaces for our 187,400 children aged 0-12. Manitoba's ability to grow child care, increase its quality and accessibility, and ensure worthy wages for early childhood educators is closely tied to decisions made in Ottawa. How Manitoba child care fares in the upcoming year will depend in great part on the outcome of election 2015.

Susan Prentice is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Manitoba and a CCPA Manitoba Research Associate.

Vote Child Care 2015  is a campaign of the Child Care Advocacy Association of Canada.

Photo: Jason Parks/flickr

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.