rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Spotlight on health care austerity: Seniors residential care

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

 

Let's break down changes in health care spending by age group. You might think that as overall health care spending in B.C. has gone up, we would see bigger jumps for those over age 65. But this is not the case -- indeed, quite the opposite. This figure shows the change in health care spending per person between 1998 and 2012, after adjusting for inflation, by age group.

 

While total health care expenditures increased by 39 per cent (right-most column), for seniors (age 65+) the picture is shocking: outright declines for those over 85; increases well below average for those 65-84. To the extent any age group is driving health care expenditures, it is predominantly the middle-aged groups. [Note: 1998 and 2012 are the start and end years of the time series available from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, Tables in E section.]

So what's going on here? The available data break expenditures down into major groups like hospitals, physicians, drugs and other institutions (which includes long-term care for seniors). When we look at these breakdowns, we find that the main driver is residential care cuts after 2002. In total budget dollars, expenditures for "other institutions" peaked at $1.65 billion in 2002, then fell to just under $1 billion in 2012. During that time total provincial health care spending grew from $10.7 billion to $17.2 billion, so these cuts can get buried in the overall funding picture. Compounding that dollar cut are inflation and population growth.

This table summarizes the changes between 2002 and 2012 for residential care expenditures for seniors (65+), per person, and adjusted for inflation:

 

 

 

The decade from 2002 to 2012 was clearly a dismal one for residential care, with expenditures per person falling by more than 60 per cent for all groups of seniors 65+.

The B.C. experience is a major outlier compared to other provinces. Up to 2002, B.C. was among the top provinces in terms of per capita expenditures for residential care. By 2012, B.C. was dead last by a huge margin. This figure just shows the three oldest groups (80-84, 85-89 and 90+), with the drop for B.C. between 2002 and 2012 from the darker blue to the red, while Canada as a whole saw an increase in expenditures (the purple to the turquoise):

 

 

 

(Note these are unadjusted for inflation; doing so would make the trends look worse for B.C.)

If B.C. could be brought up to the national average, it would dramatically improve health care services for seniors. Home care is another area of interest in terms of the real impact of cuts on seniors, but the data do not allow us to do the same type of comparisons. But the bottom line is clear: residential care services have been experiencing austerity for a long time, and this adversely affects the quality of care we are providing to seniors in B.C.

 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.