The following is a summary of the results of a survey recently published by The Kyiv International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) The summary is translated and prepared by New Cold War.org. The survey was published in Ukrainian in April 2015 and is 31 pages long.
The Kyiv International Institute of Sociology conducted a survey of attitudes of the Ukrainian people in February-March 2015. For comparison purposes, Ukraine was divided into five macro-regions:
- West (Volyn, Ivano -Frankivsk, Lviv, Rivne, Ternopil, Khmelnytsky and Chernivtsi)
- Center (Vinnytsia, Zhytomyr , Kirovohrad, Kyiv, Poltava, Sumy, Chernihiv, and the city of Kyiv)
- South (Mykolaiv, Odessa, Kherson)
- East(Dnipropetrovsk , Zaporizhia, Kharkiv)
- Donbass (Donetsk and Lugansk regions - territory controlled by Kyiv government)
The following are some of the key findings of the survey.
Immediate prospects for economic situation
This survey attempted to reflect the socio-political moods in Ukraine along with showing the differences in people’s opinions across various regions. A general question about the possible changes of Ukraine’s economic situation in the next year reflected a negative approach with 65.6 per cent of respondents stating that the change will be "significant and for the worse." Only 9.9 per cent of Ukrainians said that the change will be a positive one.
Economic prospects in five years
When asked the same question, but with a longer time frame of five years, the opinions proved to be more optimistic with 42.2 per cent stating that the economic situation will change significantly for the better and 23.4 per cent convinced it would change for the worse. Nevertheless, when asked whether generally satisfied with their life, the majority of respondents -- 65.6 per cent -- were fully or to some extent unsatisfied, and only 10.4 per cent said they were satisfied.
The results differed significantly between the Donbass macro-region and the other four macro-regions. Donbass respondents showed a high rate of 84.6 per cent who were dissatisfied with their life, whereas the other four macro- regions varied from approximately 54 per cent to 69 per cent of those dissatisfied with life.
Attitudes to EU and EEU
Opinions in regards to which integration path Ukraine should take reflected a fairly common trend in favor of the European Union. 51.4 per cent of Ukrainians were for the EU integration, and only 10.5 per cent were for the Eurasian Customs Union (ECU). 24.7 per cent were for neither and 13.3 per cent hesitated to respond. A wide spread appeared between the West and the Donbass macro-regions, with 73.7 per cent in the West supporting European Union integration and only 2.7 per cent for the Eurasian Economic Union. InDonbass, 28.5 per cent were equally for the EU and the EEU. Nevertheless, keeping in mind that the Donbass region included respondents from only those areas that are controlled by the Ukrainian authorities, the results can be seriously skewed.
NATO membership for Ukraine?
As for integration into the NATO military alliance, 48.3 per cent of respondents supported the idea while 33.4% were opposed. The trend of the highest percentage of supporters in the West region and the highest percentage of those against the accession in the Donbass region is similar to the one seen in regards to different integration paths.
The war in eastern Ukraine
The main disagreement within Ukrainian society is in regards to the military ["counterterrorist"] operations in Eastern Ukraine. 45.1 per cent of respondents support the operation and 44.0 per cent do not. Again, the West regions showed a high of 64.4 per cent in favor, 27 per cent not in favor, while in Donbass, only 4.9 per cent were in favor and 82.9 per cent were against. When respondents were asked whether they considered the Donetsk People's Republic and Lugansk People's Republic to be terrorist organizations, 62.4 per cent were more inclined to claim them as such, whereas 17.3 per cent said they were not. But in government-controlled Donetsk and Lugansk, residents reject the "terrorist" label.
It seems that even though a good number of respondents see the DPR and LPR more or less as terrorist organizations, they are not as eager to support the antiterrorist operations, which leads to conclude that they hope for alternative ways of resolving the conflict. In fact, 70.3 per cent responded in favor of negotiations and peaceful means of conflict resolution in Donbass, with only 20.6 per cent supporting military action. Even in the West macro-region, which seems to have the most negative sentiments towards the LPR and DPR and is most pro-Kyiv government, only 27 per cent responded in favor of military actions with a majority of 60.8 per cent for peaceful negotiations.
Negotiate a settlement of the war?
When asked to specify in regards to what concessions could be accepted in order to settle the conflict, 81.1 per cent spoke out for making Russian the official language of the DPR and LPR, 71.5 per cent for decentralization and expanding rights for these territories, 52.5 per cent for holding local elections, 50.3 per cent for rejecting accession to NATO, and 42.1 per cent for the ability of creating local people’s militias.
The percentage of those against the above mentioned concessions was lower than of those who were in favor. On some more radical concessions, such as granting autonomy to DPR and LPR, Ukraine’s accession to the EEU, recognition of DPR’s and LPR’s independence, recognition of Crimea’s accession to Russia as well as federalization of Ukraine, the higher percentage of respondents, to a larger or smaller degree, was against such.
* * *
Overall, then, a solid majority of those surveyed by KIIS want peace at any price. So why has the KIIS survey gone unreported in the West, and why are the U.S., U.K. and Canadian governments sending in soldiers to Western Ukraine?
Thank you for reading this story...
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.
If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.
We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.