rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Stephen Kimber's Blog

Skimber's picture
Stephen Kimber is is an award-winning writer, journalist and broadcaster. He is the author of one novel and nine books of nonfiction, including the best-selling Flight 111: The Tragedy of the Swissair Crash and Sailors, Slackers and Blind Pigs: Halifax at War. He teaches creative non-fiction at the University of King’s College in Halifax where he has served as Director of the School of Journalism on three occasions. His latest book, What Lies Across the Water: The Real Story of the Cuban Five is published by Fernwood Publishing. He is currently a weekly columnist with Halifax Metro, senior features writer for The Coast and a contributing editor for Atlantic Business Magazine.

Questioning justice in the Ghomeshi trial

| February 16, 2016
Photo: Joe Gratz/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Did he do it? Of course.

Did the Crown prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that Jian Ghomeshi sexually assaulted three women?

That's more complicated.

Let's start with what we know. Three women went to police alleging Ghomeshi sexually assaulted them, each story strikingly similar: Ghomeshi punched and choked them without consent, without warning, and with no logical or romantic connection to what happened before or after. We know other women also came forward, though not to police, with eerily comparable tales.

Cobble those together, and we know what we believe.

But in a criminal case, the Crown must -- rightly -- prove the truth of each allegation beyond reasonable doubt.

That's never easy, but he-said-she-said sexual assault allegations -- with no witnesses, no physical evidence, where time has passed and peripheral memories faded -- create a proof-mountain to daunt even the most resourceful prosecutor.

The Crown must hope the complainants are credible, and there are enough of them -- providing similar independent allegations -- to convince the judge they must be telling the truth.

The defence faces a similar hurdle, but in reverse: no witnesses, no physical evidence to prove the assault didn't happen. Its only recourse is to undermine the accusers' credibility.

Questioning what happened between each woman and Ghomeshi in the hours, days, months after the assault seems, on balance, fair. The Crown and the complainants must show -- as they did -- that their behaviour was reasonable in context. (Many of us, regardless of gender, will understand the desire not to confront, to move on.)

It's up to the judge to balance any doubts with their responses.

The fact two of the complainants shared their stories with each other in 5,000 emails, texts, social media before the court case is more problematic. The judge must now decide whether their allegations are really independent.

It's as easy to believe Ghomeshi will be acquitted as found guilty.

But what happens in court now almost doesn't matter. The complainants have rightly become social media heroes because they stood up, and because they started an important discussion. Ghomeshi has long since lost what matters most deeply to him. His reputation is shot, his career in tatters.

Justice has been served.

This article first appeared in Stephen Kimber's Halifax Metro column.

Photo: Joe Gratz/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

embedded_video

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.