the moon is down

Krystalline Kraus's picture

krystalline kraus is an intrepid explorer and reporter from Toronto Canada. A veteran activist and journalist for rabble.ca, she needs no aviator goggles, gas mask or red cape but proceeds fearlessly into the democratic fray.

This blog is about organizing and activism in Canada in a post-G20 world.

G8/G20 Communiqué: New powers of arrest for police

| June 25, 2010

Without the public's knowledge, Toronto Police Chief Bill Blair requested and received new sweeping police powers for the duration of the Summit (June 24 - June 28, 2010). The new police powers were granted by the Ontario Legislature under the Ontario's Public Works Protection Act and were not debated in the Legislature.

This information came to light after the arrest of the amazing activist Dave Vasey and was featured in an exclusive by the Toronto Star.

Quote: "Vasey was held under the Public Works Protection Act and charged with refusing to comply with a request of a peace officer. His bail lawyer, Howard Morton, said that, as far as he knows, Vasey is the first to be arrested under the new regulation.

Vasey was held under the Public Works Protection Act and charged with refusing to comply with a request of a peace officer. His bail lawyer, Howard Morton, said that, as far as he knows, Vasey is the first to be arrested under the new regulation."

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:  

-- According to the new regulation, "guards" appointed under the act can arrest anyone who, in specific areas, comes within five metres of the security zone.

-- Within those areas, police can demand identification from anyone coming within five metres of the fence perimeter and search them. If they refuse, they face arrest. Anyone convicted under the regulation could also face up to two months in jail or a $500 maximum fine.

Advertising

Personally, this sounds like a frakked up sneaking way to impose martial law over Toronto for the weekend. I mean, we know that this was passed in secret on June 2; so what other secret laws did the police ask the Ontario Government to pass that we don't know about?

Is this what democracy looks like?

For me, there is no guarantee that police will play by their own rules. Sure, it says five metres from the fence but how are you gonna prove that you were actually 7 or 20 metres from the fence if you get arrested and contest the charges. Also, during an aggressive protest situation, the police could easily claim you refused to show ID when maybe they didn't even ask.

The police could potentially move around downtown Toronto picking off anyone they like.

Toronto activist know that the police here often arrest first and sort it all out later.

So please: don't go anywhere alone; ALWAYS TRAVEL WITH A BUDDY

Please, try to not let this news panic -- empower yourself with as much information as you can.

And don't isolate yourselves -- talk to other activists about how you feel about these new draconian police powers and plan among your friends or affinity group how you guys want to move forward.

But please, keep moving forward. Steady Now. Don't let them steal away your rights.

Follow rabble.ca and I on Twitter: @krystalline_k and rabble.ca @rabbleca 

embedded_video

Tags:
G8/G20

Comments

But the same change says that your buddy's testimony would be irrelevant as any statement from a police officer is conclusive evidence.

Indeed, if a police officer saw you 5 km away and did not like you they could say you were at the fence trying to bring it down and you would be guilty.

This is what a police state looks like.

Here's an excerpt from the Public Works Protection Act, which has been on the books in Ontario for decades, and was passed a long time ago by the Legislature:

Quote:
Every person who neglects or refuses to comply with a request or direction made under this Act by a guard or peace officer, and every person found upon a public work or any approach thereto without lawful authority, the proof whereof lies on him or her, is guilty of an offence and on conviction is liable to a fine of not more than $500 or to imprisonment for a term of not more than two months, or to both.

This is the provision, passed by the Legislature, that now applies to the Security Fence, as a result of the government's new regulation designating the fence as a public work.

The same Act gives the provincial government the power to pass such regulations in secret, without consulting the Legislature or the public.

Just as was the case with the War Measures Act, which sat in the statute books for decades before the so-called October Crisis of 1970, without any hue and cry; but once the government used the powers granted to it under the Act, there was suddenly great concern from the civil liberties industry. The War Measures Act was replaced in 1988 with the Emergencies Act, which now sits quietly waiting to be invoked at the whim of any federal government. Is anybody concerned?

You can find dozens of similar laws on the statute books of the federal and provincial governments - all of them duly passed by our elected representatives, and all of them ticking time bombs just sitting there, waiting for a government to use its lawfully-granted powers to impose a police state.

This is nothing more than an immoral use of a questionable law.  The fact that the McGuinty government put this legislation into place without informing the electorate is just wrong.

On the upside, it was reported by CBC last evening that security personnel in Huntsville made two arrests yesterday.  One was for possession of marijuana and the other was for shoplifting.

Thank goodness there was heavy security presence in the area at the time.

http://viableopposition.blogspot.com/ 

Login or register to post comments