rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

G8/G20 Communique: Toronto Police Service Board sets parameters for G20 inquiry

Moving one step closer in the bureaucratic process of conducting a police-led G20 inquiry into police behaviour, the Toronto Police Service released some information regarding how it will hold its own police inquiry into the police. [Hey fox, don't take your eyes off the henhouse!]

The review will be carried out by a former judge, to be publicly named September 23, 2010, and who will tackle troubling questions such as what orders were given that led to the arrest of more than 1,000 people and the "kettling" of peaceful protesters.

"This review . . . will help us understand not only what didn't work but what worked," said chair Alok Mukherjee, moments before the board approved the six-page terms of reference, outlining key areas to be addressed. Among the subjects to be reviewed:

--Why did police disperse demonstrators from their designated area at Queen's Park and detain protesters on the Esplanade?

--Why did police use a tactic known as "kettling," in which protesters were corralled into a tight, enclosed space without access to food, water or bathrooms?

--What orders were given by Toronto police in response to the destruction of cruisers and damage of property in the financial district, and along Queen Street and Yonge Street?

--What orders were given by police about using tear gas to disperse people outside the prisoner detention centre on Eastern Avenue?

--Did officers remove or cover their name badges or badge numbers?

You can read the Toronto Police Service's draft terms of reference for its inquiry here.

John Sewell, of the Toronto Police Accountability Coalition, is critical of the police's plan to police itself and stated, "A full public inquiry is what is needed with powers of subpoena and the calling of evidence from all parties, including other police forces involved,"


The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has been critical of the G20 police's action during the G20 Summit weekend and supports a full, public inquiry.

"It is CCLA's opinion that Canadians deserve to know why the security apparatus failed to adequately fulfill its role to protect the public's freedom of expression and assembly, in addition to ensuring the safety of G20 delegates.

"The Canadian Civil Liberties Association has been actively involved in ensuring accountability in policing and governance before, during, and especially after the G20 summit." You can read its reports here.

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing in 2017.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.