rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Danielle Smith betrayed the Wildrose. Jim Prentice betrayed the rest of us.

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Image: Flickr/Dave Cournoyer

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."

---Abraham Lincoln

Premier Prentice gave every member of his caucus a copy of Doris Kearns Goodwin's book Team of Rivals. No doubt to help them "decide" whether to let Danielle Smith, the leader of the Opposition, and eight members of her Wildrose caucus join the Progressive Conservative government. 

The absurdity of the situation escaped his dimwitted caucus.    

The book describes Abraham Lincoln's relationship the three men in his own party who challenged Lincoln for the Republican presidential nomination.  After Mr. Lincoln won the presidency he persuaded these three members of his own party to join his cabinet.  

In case Mr. Prentice hasn't caught my drift, there's a huge difference between asking members of your own party to help you solve difficult problems and allowing a bunch of opportunistic carpetbaggers, some demanding cabinet posts, in the door.     


Prentice's Perfidy

The fact that Mr. Prentice welcomed the gang of hypocrites who staged "one of the greatest acts of betrayal in Canadian political history" with open arms tells us a lot about Mr Prentice.    

Mr. Prentice says it's an opportunity to unite the conservative family.  He's delighted that the PCs once again represent the "full diversity of voices and regions from across all Alberta (read: we've recaptured the rural vote). He says Alberta needed "united leadership and shared purpose in tackling the challenges ahead." 

United leadership and shared purpose?  In case Mr. Prentice hasn't noticed, he already has an overwhelming majority in the Legislature and under his much touted "new management" he can accomplish anything his little heart desires.     

No, this was simply a bargain with the devil to avoid the risk of a minority government in the next election. 


Reunification at what cost?

Ms. Soapbox is not totally naïve. She knows that some politicians are self-serving opportunistic swine.  However even she expected better of this premier.

A review of the Reunification Agreement sets out four themes that show how far Mr. Prentice is willing go to win a majority government in the next election. 

1.  Violating the trust of PC voters:   By agreeing to the Wildrose policies set out in the agreement Mr Prentice violated the trust PC voters placed in him and his government.  If they wanted to be governed under Wildrose policies they would have voted for the Wildrose party in 2012 and 2014.  They didn't.

Specifically, PC voters did not vote for narrow social conservatism which enhances parental rights at the expense of the rights of LBGTQ children.  Mr Prentice wisely backed away from this policy when he "paused" Bill 10, but reversed his position to appease the nine Wildrose defectors.    

2.  "Selling" the premier's personal endorsement:  Mr. Prentice gave the defecting Wildrose MLAs a lock on the PC nomination process in the upcoming election.  In an open letter Mr Prentice personally endorsed each Wildrose MLA who chooses to run as a PC candidate in the 2015 nomination process.  Can I have an endorsement if I promise to stop slagging the premier on the Soapbox?  

3.  Violating the candidate selection process:  The agreement effectively blocks anyone but the defecting Wildrose MLAs from being a PC candidate in their riding in the next election.  If a misguided member of the PC party were to put his name forward he'll receive a call reminding him of the Premier's endorsement.  I understand that such "reminder" calls run the gamut from "you've got to take one for the party, step aside" to "get out of the way if you know what's good for you".  

By blocking nominations from anyone but the defecting Wildrose MLA, Mr. Prentice subverted the democratic process of candidate selection and is forcing his choice, no, Danielle Smith's choice of candidates on the PC voters in these ridings. 

4.  Stealing the Opposition:  Mr. Prentice negotiated with the Official Opposition as a bloc.  He violated his promise of greater accountability, transparency and good governance because he knew that if he succeeded he'd destroy the most effective opposition Alberta has had in decades.   

Mr. Prentice stole the Opposition from the Albertans who put it there.  Then he smugly announced that his seat count now equals that of ex-premiers Lougheed and Klein.  What he fails to recognize is that in Lougheed and Klein's day it was the people, not the premier who put them there.   


Cabinet vs Board Room

Mr. Prentice fulfilled his promise of a "government under new management".  He handpicks his cabinet, parachuting outsiders into key portfolios like a CEO picking his executive team.  He grows market share in rural areas by poaching "talent" that can deliver the votes.  He mitigates a loss of market share by co-opting the Opposition so they can't hold the government to account. 

Abe Lincoln said:  test a man's integrity by giving him power.  Mr. Prentice had the power to say "thanks, but no thanks" when presented with the Wildrose defection plan. Instead he gutted the Opposition by drafting its disaffected MLAs into government. 

It's a shrewd move if you're a CEO.  It's an abuse of power if you're the premier.    




Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.