rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Afghanistan agreement shows that U.S. government still doesn't get it

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

During a midnight deal signed in Kabul last week, President Obama extended the stay of U.S. troops in Afghanistan until 2024. Regardless of the justifications used to keep troops in the foreign country, the basic point, coming from working and underclass people at home in the U.S., is still not being addressed.

While the anti-war crowd has always been opposed to the war and destruction in Afghanistan, people throughout the social and political spectrum are finally beginning to realize the simple equation that every dollar spent in Afghanistan means one less dollar spent here. And this realization is becoming more and more apparent as more people need more of those dollars here.

Maybe that is a reason why even Mitt Romney supporters are evenly in favour of withdrawing American financial and personnel commitments from Afghanistan starting now, not even waiting for 2014.

It may come as no surprise, therefore, that the effective decade-long extension of American tax dollar commitments to Afghanistan has not been publically announced, least of all portrayed as such to the American people by the mainstream U.S. media.

The point is not for the Obama-edition of the U.S. political class to figure out new ways to justify continuing the cash flow for military and resource industry complexes, as it comes up with new excuses to stay in Afghanistan -- it's about Obama realizing that American citizens are asking for those networks and resources that Obama is committing to Afghanistan, to be established and committed here at home, including American citizens.

Obama had held off U.S. troop withdrawal from Afghanistan until the election year when the timing of troop withdrawal (or at least the announcement) could have been used and marketed to re-establish himself as the peacemaker.

Unfortunately, his administration, among countless others previous, has failed to see that the logic behind appeasing the "peace-niks" is not just about winning a voting demographic; it's about preserving a country, at home, that is worth protecting.

The Republicans have done everything possible to give the impression that it isn't safe to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, and the mainstream media has done everything possible to use those contrived safety concerns to overshadow reporting on the reality of crumbling local infrastructures that need a financial and resource-based infusion domestically.

This has become more than just a voter issue to win points in an election race -- it's about doing what needs to be done to re-establish the U.S., domestically, as a country and citizenry worth saving. It's not about protecting the jewels of empire and imperialism and holding onto them for display like trophies in a case, either. It's about spreading the wealth domestically, and that begins with a re-prioritizing of nationalism over imperialism.

The midnight deal ratified by Presidents Obama and Karzai last week in Kabul took the United States in the complete opposite direction and kept domestic taxpayers on the hook for another ten years at least.

Although the agreement, which provides the framework for co-operation based on already established partnerships, is in effect until 2024 -- it doesn't come into effect until both parties complete "their respective internal legal requirements necessary for the entry into force of this agreement." The agreement also gives either country the option to break out of the deal, by giving a year's notice and also allows both countries to renew the agreement indefinitely, come 2024.





Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.