rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Canadian government needs to stand up for species at risk

Photo: flickr/daryl_mitchell

The 2002 Species At Risk Act (SARA) is a commitment made by the Canadian federal government to prevent wildlife species from becoming extinct, all the while taking the necessary precautions to assist in their recovery. There are now more than 500 species listed under this Act and yet only seven action plans have been completed, with less than 190 species even receiving review. The Canadian government needs to be responsible and accountable for its actions.

This national act, by law, is really only mandatorily applicable to aquatic wildlife and species found on federals lands such as national parks. The remaining species, under provincial jurisdiction? Hardly fortunately, the SARA has thought this through by a provision known as the safety net. This safety net allows the federal government to order SARA's protection on species on other lands. This safety net, however, requires the recommendation of the prime minister if, and only if, provincial governments are failing to protect the species/habitats under their jurisdiction. To date, the safety net has never been employed appropriately (if ever).

Our SARA is one of our country's most modern species laws, completely equipped with all the necessary tools to help species survive, recover and thrive but yet, our government's efforts to administer its very own laws have been exemplified by chronic delays. With not a single provincial jurisdiction in the country receiving a mark higher than a C in their efforts to protect endangered species, the federal government undoubtedly needs to do something about the implementation of its own Acts. (This grade given by EcoJustice, a non-profit law firm protecting the environment)

Why should our government be responsible for the administration of the SARA? Because, in short, both the country and the world we live in belong to our grandchildren. We are so privileged to live in a rich ecosystem complete with storehouses of biological resources and wonderful species to admire. These magnificent organisms are dying and we, the destroyers, are the only ones capable of reversing the damage.

We need our government to spearhead conservation activities so that all citizens are fully aware and ready to help in bringing back our wildlife. The Canadian government employed the SARA for a very worthy reason and it is not to be undermined.

Kelly Truong is a Grade 12 Vancouver high school student attending Windermere Secondary.

Photo: flickr/daryl_mitchell

Thank you for reading this story...

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all. But media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our only supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help.

If everyone who visits rabble and likes it chipped in a couple of dollars per month, our future would be much more secure and we could do much more: like the things our readers tell us they want to see more of: more staff reporters and more work to complete the upgrade of our website.

We’re asking if you could make a donation, right now, to set rabble on solid footing.

Make a donation.Become a monthly supporter.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.