Tao takedown

 The Tao of Inner Peace
And inner peace remained elusive

Do you know five edible plants native to your region? Or what phase the moon is in now? Does a meeting with friends give you energy? Are you proud to tell people what your job is?

If you answered no to these questions, there may be something wrong with you. You're not a “Tao person,” and according to Diane Dreherâe(TM)s The Tao of Inner Peace, you need to learn how to harmonize with the Tao.

Dreher is a former sixties activist turned New-Age consultant. She has written not just this but a series of books (The Tao of Personal Leadership; The Tao of Womanhood; Inner Gardening) that purport to interpret the teachings of the legendary Chinese sage Laozi to help upper-middle-class Americans solve lifestyle glitches and achieve world peace while advancing their careers at the same time.

If this book already appeals to you, don't hurry through the rest of this reviewâe"you might de-centre something.

A lit theory prof of mine taught that the best form of criticism was internal critique: showing how the logic of a book works against itself. Sometimes, however, external critique is better, such as when a massive bestseller, into many reprints, is complete bullshit.

To be fair, bullshit is not exactly what you'd call The Tao of Peace; it's too full of empty platitudes and truisms for that: “Aware of the cycles in life, we realize that for every project, every process, thereâe(TM)s a beginning and endingâe¦ Our seeds will sprout when they are ready.” Wordy bromides are threaded with teaching tales about dysfunctional people; nitty-gritty advice like “don't overuse bleach and scouring powders”; helpful tips on cleaning out drawers and closets; descriptions of “quick chi breaks” you can take at work; and tips on how to shield yourself from relentlessly negative people. (Who, me?)

Which brings us to the internal critique. To quote Dreher, “we're all part of the one, but sometimes we get distracted by the details.” But the book is bursting with small details. While sometimes useful one by one, they don't hang together as much more than a mushy self-help encyclopedia, and their relationship to Laozi is incidental at best. You could say they are not in harmony with the Tao.

What's more, the author predictably favours the positive, the soft, the yielding; she is dangerously de-centred and out of touch with her yang side.

But the biggest problem with this book is that it is tedious and repetitive. It is a struggle to pick up where you've left off. Each page sounds like the next. If it's not irritating you with affected dulcet tones, it's putting you to sleep.

Diane, here's a clue from Laozi himself:

In ancient times there were great Taoist Sages.Their way of living was so deep, so subtle, it cannot be directly explained.

So why spend 300 pages explaining it to the gullible, the self-centred, those genuinely in need of help? Apparently, because it sells. People will pay you to tell them what they want to hear. But as Laozi also said, “true words are not pleasant; pleasant words are not true.”

What is there to do when the original “Tao person” himself brings you down with that kind of negative energy?

related items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.