Lindsay Beyerstein

Weekly Pulse: White House takes offensive against health care repeal

| January 20, 2011
Lindsay Beyerstein

Weekly Pulse: Giffords shooting reveals flaws in U.S. mental health services

| January 13, 2011
Lindsay Beyerstein

Weekly Pulse: End-of-life counseling returns, but death panels still nonsense

| December 29, 2010
Lindsay Beyerstein

Weekly Pulse: Egg salad surprise! Congress votes to clean up food supply

| December 23, 2010
Lindsay Beyerstein

Weekly Pulse: DIY abortions on the border, Pawlenty screws Minnesota on sex ed

| September 1, 2010

Not Rex: Delivering the goods on #M312

A Con backbencher wants to pass a motion to debate the beginning of life. But Harpo swears, again, this isn't about reopening the abortion debate. But at least soon nobody will stop the trade in human ova and surrogacy!

Columnists

The science and art of defeating Motion 312

Photo: Garth Gullekson, Darlington Mediaworks/radicalhandmaids.com

The pro-choice movement scored a significant victory last week in the Parliamentary debate over anti-choice Motion 312. It could prove to be a watershed moment, one that could end the abortion debate in Canada forever -- or at least until Christian fundamentalists stage an improbable coup and enslave Canadian women into a version of Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale.

Bernadette Wagner

It's a war on women

| April 24, 2012
Columnists

Motion 312: An ignorant affront to global human rights standards

A new international report on women's rights versus fetal rights has arrived just in time to help demolish Motion 312, Conservative MP Stephen Woodworth's attempt to give legal protection to fetuses in Canada by including them in the Criminal Code definition of "human being." The report, Whose Right to Life? Women's Rights and Prenatal Protections under Human Rights and Comparative Law, comes from the U.S.-based Center for Reproductive Rights (CRR), a global legal advocacy organization.

Syndicate content