buy americanSyndicate content

rabble news

Harper folds again, this time on 'Buy American'

In 2007, the Harper government gleefully boasted about how quickly it managed to negotiate the U.S.-Canada Softwood Lumber Agreement. What it failed to mention was the deal's disastrous impact on Canada's forestry sector, one that has cost taxpayers $1 billion and counting, and thousands of Canadian jobs.

Last week Harper and his team were at it again. This time it was the agreement with the U.S. on how to handle the "Buy American" provisions in their stimulus legislation. While the Conservatives have been touting their apparent success in having Canadian companies exempted from such regulations, the reality is that there are grave concerns about what the deal means for job losses in Canada.

embedded_video

Buy American issue is back in the news

| September 15, 2011
press release

NDP get support for 'Buy American Trade Deal' hearings motion

OTTAWA - NDP International Trade Critic Peter Julian secured full support for his motion pushing the Standing Committee on International Trade to hold hearings to review the Buy American agreement which was signed and implemented on Feb. 16th by the Harper government while Parliament was prorogued.

Julian will be calling on expert witnesses to provide answers to many of the questions that Canadian municipalities, companies and the public are asking.

"We seem to have given up a considerable amount of access to public procurement right across the country and these hearings should help determine how much we have given up and how much of the US market we can effectively access", said Julian.

embedded_video

Columnists

The invisible impact of 'Buy American'

It's a clear case of déjà vu all over again. Back in the '80s, Brian Mulroney raised the spectre of U.S. protectionism, then set out to win guaranteed access for our exports. He didn't succeed: We got a "dispute panel" system, instead, and even that doesn't work. But his government was publicly committed to guaranteed access, so Mr. Mulroney put a brave face on his 1988 deal --spinning it as essential insurance and worth the steep price (control over our energy).

James Laxer

Urgent national debate needed on Harper trade deal

| February 7, 2010
Blair Redlin

Losing sight of the economic forest for 'Buy American' trees

| July 16, 2009
rabble news

Are EU trade talks behind the pressure to end local procurement?

Judging by all the recent hype about “Buy America,” you’d think Canada had suddenly been devastated by some horrible natural disaster.

As if out of nowhere, “Buy America” provisions in the U.S. stimulus Bill are suddenly at the top of the policy agenda for the Harper government, the Premiers and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. It matters little that the U.S. government has had “Buy America” laws in place since 1933.

embedded_video

Columnists

'Buy American' mayhem

So was that just a dream we dreamed after all -- that we had a free-trade deal with the U.S. giving us secure access to their markets and their public procurement? Because we learned this week that their Congress added a Buy American clause to its huge stimulus package excluding us, causing people both here and there to panic. Or maybe what we got was free trade with a different United States, not the one just south of here?

No, Virginia, it's even weirder. This week's horror and hysteria over a U.S. move to "protectionism" like the Smoot-Hawley tariffs of the 1930s, leading to global "trade war" and disaster -- was sheer myth. The Buy American clause and the ensuing "backdown" by Congress meant nothing.

Syndicate content