Wildrose Party disguises health-care myths as facts

| April 9, 2012

Health care and the 2012 federal budget

| March 29, 2012

The politics of the 2014 health accord in Victoria

| January 19, 2012

More than 250 people at health-care forum in Victoria

| January 17, 2012

Roundtable on health care in Victoria

| January 16, 2012
in her own words

As premiers prepare to meet in Victoria, civil society comes together to protect public health care

MPs Anne Minh Thu Quach and Liby Davies at roundtable on healthcare.

Protection of our public health-care system always ranks as Canadians' number one concern. It reflects deep Canadian values of fairness and accessibility in the provision of basic services that we all need.

I hear all the time from people who are very worried about what the Conservative government is up to when it comes to health care.

This week, Victoria will host the premiers' conference on health care. But their meeting has already been undermined by the federal Finance Minister's unilateral declaration on future federal funding for health care, when the current Health Accord runs out in 2014.

embedded_video

in his own words

Leading Canada's public healthcare to the free-market guillotine

Art: Elisabeth Belliveau/www.elisabethbelliveau.com

National discussion in Canada on the Conservative government's new healthcare financial ultimatum, a take-it-or-leave-it-style proposal, largely revolves around myths. First that financing alone is key to securing a sustainable public healthcare system and second that free-market economic winds will provide sustainable guidelines, via GDP, for viable future government healthcare financing.

A surprise delivery from Conservative Finance Minister Jim Flaherty to provincial finance ministers, over a fancy lunch-in at the Chateau Victoria Hotel this past Monday, the plan offers no space for negotiation toward collective national solutions for public healthcare.

embedded_video

in her own words

Bad medicine from advisory panel at CMA annual meeting

Imagine you're feeling sick. You have an inexplicable pain in your stomach. So you go to your doctor, and she sends you for a test. The test for your stomach pain is inconclusive.

"I think I know what the problem is. And I probably have something I could give you for it," says your doctor. "How about you pay me an extra $50, and then we can discuss it further?"

Most of us would think that's unacceptable. We already pay taxes to finance our universal health care. We would want our doctors to run more tests, give us a diagnosis and write us a prescription.

embedded_video

Syndicate content