GDPSyndicate content

Lindsay Beyerstein

Weekly Audit: What will the GOP cut?

| January 18, 2011
Columnists

The pros and cons of foreign investment

The Investment Canada Act, implemented in 1985 by the government of Brian Mulroney, replaced the Foreign Investment Review Agency, which had become a potent symbol of Pierre Trudeau's interventionism. While the new act was explicitly intended to welcome foreign investment (including takeovers) with open arms, it included a "net benefit" test to supposedly protect Canadian interests.

Columnists

Private sector is not helping economic recovery

Tepid GDP numbers released Tuesday by Statistics Canada confirm that Canada's economic recovery, such as it was, is sliding completely into the ditch. We're clearly heading for stagnation at best, and quite possibly another "double dip" downturn.

The headline number was disappointing, to say the least. Real GDP grew only 2 per cent (annualized) in the spring quarter. That's just a hair faster than the U.S. economy (which everyone knows is still deeply in the soup). Two per cent doesn't keep up with population and productivity -- implying higher unemployment ahead, not lower. Typically, at this stage of recovery, the economy should be growing three times faster.

Seth Klein

De-growth or growth? Maybe we don't need to figure that out

| May 17, 2012
Columnists

Canada's petro-recovery

Statistics Canada released the third-quarter GDP numbers yesterday, and on the surface they seem pretty upbeat, considering all the doom and gloom lately. Headline real GDP grew at an annualized 3.5 per cent rate. I predicted a few weeks back that there was no chance that the 3Q number would be negative (thus sparing us a "technical recession," on the tails of the GDP contraction in the second quarter). But I certainly didn't expect a number that strong.

Columnists

No technical recession, not that it matters

Yesterday's GDP numbers (a sprightly gain of 0.3 per cent at basic prices in July) ensure that there will not be a so-called "technical recession" in Canada -- at least, not yet.

Economists have a perverted definition of "recession," whereby it's considered official only if real GDP declines 2 quarters in a row. That's hilariously arbitrary. And the flip side of the coin is even more galling: "recovery" is with us, they say, once real GDP stops contracting and starts growing again. That's why Mark Carney could declare the recession over in July 2009 (when real GDP started to grow again), even though for most Canadians it hasn't stopped feeling like a recession ever since.

The underground economy and business tax evasion

| June 30, 2011
Jim Stanford

The $0.3 billion question

| June 7, 2011
Jim Stanford

GDP report: Awfully weak tea leaves

| May 31, 2011
Columnists

Kerala a happy exception to the Indian norm

Any good sex therapist will tell you it's not what you've got that matters. It's more important how you use what you've got.

The same sound advice applies in an economy, too. Statisticians and politicians alike obsess over the latest ups and downs of GDP, assumed to reflect the progress of an entire economy. But in practice, a well-endowed GDP means nothing if it isn't put to good work. If extra economic production (measured by an expanding GDP) does not bring improvements in the human condition, then what's the point?

Syndicate content