Canada's petro-recovery
Statistics Canada released the third-quarter GDP numbers yesterday, and on the surface they seem pretty upbeat, considering all the doom and gloom lately. Headline real GDP grew at an annualized 3.5 per cent rate. I predicted a few weeks back that there was no chance that the 3Q number would be negative (thus sparing us a "technical recession," on the tails of the GDP contraction in the second quarter). But I certainly didn't expect a number that strong.
Weekly Audit: Your vote, your economy -- why today's election matters to your pocketbook
| November 2, 2010Financial elite have no shame
Let's imagine, for a moment, how different the public debate would be today if it had been unions that had caused the current economic turmoil.
In other words, try to imagine a scenario in which union leaders -- not financial managers -- were the ones whose reckless behaviour had driven a number of Wall Street firms into bankruptcy and in the process triggered a worldwide recession.
Needless to say, it's hard to imagine a labour leader being appointed to oversee a bailout of unions the way former Goldman Sachs CEO Henry Paulson was put in charge of supervising the $700 billion bailout of his former Wall Street colleagues.
What's stimulus, anyway? A simple user's guide
In 1971, Richard Nixon famously declared, "We are all Keynesians now." Yet, even as he spoke those words, the economics profession (led by Milton Friedman) was turning sour on government intervention - celebrating, instead, the self-correcting virtues of the free market.
Suddenly, however, the pendulum's come flying back. It's awfully hard to praise unregulated markets these days. And "stimulus" is the economic flavour of the month. Politicians of all stripes are on the bandwagon - even many who, until six months ago, derided the very concept. Our own Finance Minister, Jim Flaherty, is now putting the finishing touches on a budget that, he will claim, does its share of "stimulus."