spending cutsSyndicate content

Open letter from a former Katimavik participant

Photo: Gabrielle de Montigny
A former Katimavik participant reflects on the Conservative government's decision to cut the program.

Related rabble.ca story:

Preparing for the 2012 federal budget

Photo: Kitty Canuck
Finance Minister Jim Flaherty prepares to deliver one of the most draconian budgets in recent years.

Related rabble.ca story:

Grey power and changes to the public pension system

Photo: Tania Liu/Flickr
The numbers and politics behind Harper's proposed changes to Old Age Security.

Related rabble.ca story:

Reality-check on B.C. government spending: Is the overspending fear-mongering justified?

| May 10, 2013
Columnists

A number is never just a number: What price, austerity?

Photo: judepics; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t

$11.8 billion

Estimated federal government spending cuts by 2014-15, due to the last three austerity budgets. (Source - Numbers in that blog are drawn from the Federal Budget 2013, pg. 298)

90,000

Estimated job losses in both the public and private sector by 2014-15, as a result of a succession of federal government austerity budget decisions. (Source)

3.2 per cent

Columnists

Democratic governments and looking out for others

Photo: ajusticenetwork/Flickr

Recently the Harper government decided to close the Kitsilano Coast Guard station which provided search and rescue services in waters bordering Vancouver. The numerous watercraft (representing 20 million human transits annually) crossing English Bay and False Creek now have to depend on a station over one-half hour from the centre of water traffic.

Though only one small instance of massive government cutbacks, it nevertheless affects the sense of well-being in the lower mainland of British Columbia.

Though the Conservatives deny it, the Kitsilano closure puts lives in danger. Providing security for citizens is what democratic governments are supposed to do.

Columnists

Drinking the financial hemlock: Balancing public budgets to enrich the financial sector

Photo: d.neuman/Flickr

It's budget season everywhere, and it's all about debt and deficits and the elusive quest to balance the beast, which can only be done, it is said, by cutting services or raising taxes.

The burden of interest charges -- on the same scale as health or education in most provincial budgets -- doesn't get questioned because interest is fixed by the gods according to divine law, retribution from which we can only escape through harsher and harsher penance.

Or is it? Let's chew on a couple of startling points.

Elizabeth May

Budget 2013: Flaherty has changed more than just his footwear

| March 25, 2013
Columnists

EI 'reform' and Harper's election strategy in Atlantic Canada

Photo: michael_swan/Flickr

The triumphal Harper plan -- trash the public sector and all its (Liberal) works, and let the oilsands economy pick up the slack while transforming Canada into a right-wing energy superpower -- is on the skids. The polls are reflecting it in the prime minister's and his party's slipping public confidence ratings. The Harper showpiece, the budget, is full of non-specifics and shoes-yet-to-drop and merely raises new questions. The real point now, I suggest, is how much damage is yet to be done by this government before its number is finally up in a couple of years.

Budget 2013: Austerity through infrastructure cuts

| March 21, 2013
Syndicate content