strategic votingSyndicate content

Quebec election: Strategic voting and the myth of change

Photo: D'Arcy Norman.

For the second time in sixteen months, Quebecers will head to the polls and cast their ballots. Once again the Quebec voter, like all those who have voted before her/him, is faced with a daunting choice: do I vote for the change I wish to see, or do I vote to keep those who represent the policies I vehemently oppose out of office?

Granted, a voter scarcely finds a party that stands for all she believes in, hence the differing positions within a political party during a leadership race. Yet, there will almost always be a party that best represents a voter's aspirations, with the voter having to compromise on other, less significant, positions.

embedded_video

David J. Climenhaga

Today's cabinet appointments likely to disappoint Alberta's 'strategic' voters

| May 8, 2012
Brian Topp

Liberals and the 'strategic voting' political drug

| April 30, 2012
David J. Climenhaga

If you have any doubts left Alberta's Conservatives are done like dinner, this should settle 'em

| April 19, 2012
David J. Climenhaga

Alberta needs a real progressive opposition, not a fake progressive conservative one

| April 18, 2012

The perils of 'strategic' voting

| May 10, 2011
Columnists

Learning and co-operation best options for tough challenges ahead

Quebec tried, but the rest of Canada couldn't pull it out of the hat.

As delighted as many of us are to be sending a historic number of NDPers to Ottawa, the fact is that this election was largely a referendum on Stephen Harper's rights-defying prison-and-punishment agenda, and he won. The Official Opposition will exercise precious little real power.

Of course, many of us disagree strongly with right-wing Tea Party politics. But resistance to the Conservatives went much deeper. Harper took so many liberties with the basic tenets of democracy and respect for Parliament that even the country's leading constitutional expert became an advocate of strategic voting (and projectdemocracy.ca) to defeat him.

Whip Harper video puts a fresh spin on strategic voting!

The majority of Canadians -- 6 out of 10 of us -- want to put an end to the Harper government. And, it's easier than you may think.

If we work together, it will only take 10% of us voting strategically to whip Harper. However, if we divide our votes again, we will end up with another conservative government...
... and, well, that would suck.

So, let's all make our vote count. It's simple. Vote for the candidate in your riding that has the best chance of defeating the conservatives. No matter who it is.

Here's what to do:
1 - Watch and share the Whip Harper video:
2 - Follow the link to www.whipharper.ca and find out more about voting in your riding.
3 - Click "Attending" for this event and share with your friends.

NDP strategist Brian Topp on strategic voting

Brian Topp offers a short history and his take on strategic voting in Canada.

Columnists

Quebec leads the way to political change

Who's complaining about polling now? The polls have been wild and crazy, but they're revolutionizing this election. So what's the message in the madness?

First and foremost, hats off to Quebec. She just can't seem to help herself. It looks like she just might rescue Canada -- again.

Remember, last time out it was Quebec that mostly saved us from a 2008 Harper majority. And it happened poetically. Francophone artists went viral and turned the tide. Once Quebeckers realized that Harper scoffed at the arts, a worrisome flirtation was off and the Conservatives stalled at the same 10 seats they got in 2006. The rest is history.

Syndicate content