urban planningSyndicate content

Columnists

Rethinking the Halifax convention centre: What if it didn't go ahead?

I'm anxious to stop bleeding electronic ink on the subject, but it looks as though the convention centre saga is far from over and will be keeping the opinion mills running for some time. The province supports it, but that's far from a clincher. The city could have trouble swallowing its third of the $160-million bill and the federal third seems to me particularly iffy.

We've been talking as though the federal share is a foregone conclusion, but in fact Ottawa has still to be asked to cough up a $47-million lump sum when the project is finished, and it's not the kind of outfit that coughs up just like that.

Columnists

It's decision time on Halifax convention centre

Be a man, stop shilly-shallying and give this revitalizing project the go-ahead, says one side.

Be a man, stop shilly-shallying and stop this foolishness dead in its tracks, says the other.

This is what Premier Darrell Dexter is getting in both ears as decision time draws nigh on the proposed convention centre/hotel complex for downtown Halifax.

Since it's going to get scorched no matter what, minimizing the outrage is the best the NDP government can hope for politically.

It is, therefore, proper that the premier and his divided cabinet ignore the hollering and take the time to make a decision they can reasonably defend -- whatever it is.

Columnists

Crunch time for Halifax convention centre

The proposal for a new convention centre complex in downtown Halifax has been delivered, and government is chewing over the implications. Infrastructure Minister Bill Estabrooks has said that by the fall a decision will be made whether something will be built -- if so, what, and if not, what the next step will be.

In deciding, the government will also take into account the interests of "all Nova Scotians," Estabrooks said, considering that a public investment possibly north of $140 million will be required.

Columnists

The road to a happier outcome for a downtown Halifax complex

Let's start the story from scratch. We have a big empty space in the heart of the capital city, a desire on all sides to fill it with something that will make the city proud, and the usual corrosive dispute between developers and critics about how to do it.

Let me argue that the dispute is not as bad as it seems, and that we could even be inching towards something vaguely resembling compromise.

This is based on two things. First, the process is now right. By making the background studies public, the NDP government has largely removed itself from suspicion and put itself in a position to be an honest broker for the convention centre project.

Columnists

We need to talk: Proposed Halifax convention centre could cost $100 million

WHOA. About this proposed convention centre in downtown Halifax that could cost $100 million in taxpayer dollars (more, if experience elsewhere serves): We need to talk, fast.

We've chowed down on the promises of convention centre promoters and ignored a powerful set of facts that paint a bleak picture of the convention business, making success in Halifax a long shot indeed.

Street Cred

Toronto's urban dilemma

January 13, 2010
| John Sewell on Canada's housing program.

10:46 minutes (9.86 MB)
rabble news

BigBoxing in Salmon Arm: Round two

Part two of a two-part story. Click here to read part one.

For two years, community activists in Salmon Arm led the fight against a gigantic Smart!Centres development planned for an environmentally sensitive floodplain. In October 2008, after five nights of emotional public hearings at which hundreds of community members spoke passionately against the plan, the council voted down the development by the narrowest of margins.

With a three-three tie vote, it was a TKO.

embedded_video

rabble news

BigBoxing in Salmon Arm: Round one

Part one of a two-part story. Click here to read part two.

For two years, community activists in Salmon Arm led the fight against a gigantic Smart!Centres development planned for an environmentally sensitive floodplain. In October 2008, after five nights of emotional public hearings at which hundreds of community members spoke passionately against the plan, the council voted down the development by the narrowest of margins.

With a three-three tie vote, it was a TKO.

A year later, the developer is back, slicker and meaner, and the community is gearing up for another bitter fight. Will sprawl development or smart development emerge triumphant this round?

embedded_video

Syndicate content