Maryam MonsefSyndicate content

New minister for democratic reforms Karina Gould and PM Trudeau
| January 20, 2017
Image: CPAC
| January 4, 2017

Liberals' online survey on electoral reform reeks of bias

Facebook/Maryam Monsef
Instead of proceeding with a respectful and reasoned consultation on electoral reform, based on the House committee report, the government has launched a biased, mischievous survey of "values."

Related story:

| December 7, 2016
Image: CPAC
| December 2, 2016
Image: Facebook/Maryam Monsef
| November 30, 2016

Change the way we vote

In May 2016, the Liberal government is proposed that a special committee study the alternatives for reforming first past the post voting and report back to the House of Commons by Dec. 1.   After some initial hiccups, the committee is meeting and working.


| July 26, 2016

Beyond cabinet parity: Gender equity requires less talk, more legislation

Photo: flickr/Day Donaldson

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne unveiled a midterm cabinet shuffle last month that boosted the percentage of women in her executive council to 40 per cent, the highest in Ontario's history.



We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.
April 1, 2016 |
Opponents of electoral reform sometimes claim that proportional representation means amending the constitution or could be subject to a constitutional challenge. They're wrong.
Syndicate content