The Liberals: Whatever happened to the greatest good for the greatest number?

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

Liberal Party fortunes are so bleak that when an EKOS poll put them at 29 per cent support (neck-and-neck with the Harper Conservatives) it was an occasion for celebration ... that is something other than having the good sense to hold a caucus retreat in beautiful Baddeck, Nova Scotia.

Most analysis focuses on lacklustre leadership to explain why the once mighty Liberal Party of Canada stands so low in public esteem. True, Michael Ignatieff remains disliked or not liked by about three out of four Canadians. Agreed, he has yet to reveal any personal gift for electoral politics. Indeed, until his recent Liberal Express bus tour of Canada, he had not shown a real determination to get on with the job he inherited when the Liberal caucus made Stephan Dion step aside.

Liberals are not the only party with leadership problems. Stephen Harper represents the Liberals' best chance to take charge in a minority parliament. As Brian Topp concludes in his blog post, by trying to dump the long gun registry, Harper seems bent on making Ignatieff look good.

Liberals have money problems. The Conservatives have raised $8 million in the first six months of this year, while the Liberals have collected only $3 million. Until direct corporate donations were eliminated, the Liberal party lived off money from the four big banks (CIBC, BMO, RBS, and Scotia) and each of their associated investment brokers. With the eight entities each kicking in about $250,000, Bay Street provided a $ 2 million basic yearly budget for the Liberals. When Prime Minister Jean Chrétien changed the financing rules, it was the party he led that suffered the most, and they have yet to recover.

Money talks, and it talked the Liberals into becoming Bay Street friendly, turning away from the pre-occupations of voters in Quebec for example, worried about health care, and unemployment insurance, and unimpressed by $100 billion worth of tax cuts in the 2000 Paul Martin budget the supposed "reward" after massive budget cuts made by Chrétien and Martin in 1995.

Pollster Nik Nanos told The Hill Times the Liberals "need to put something in the window" so that people have something to judge. If asked what the Liberals stand for, many Canadians would be hard pressed to answer. "A strong banking sector? " Maybe. Many Liberals would be hard placed to come up with a meaningful response.

At one time it meant something to be a Liberal. When Pierre-Joseph-Olivier Chauveau announced his candidacy for the parliament of the Province of Canada in 1844, he summarized his program this way: The greatest good for the greatest number. This liberal creed, as identified by British social philosopher Jeremy Bentham as the greatest happiness, still resonates today, but Liberals have lost touch with the ideas that once inspired people to join the party -- and vote for it.

In his first campaign speech, Chauveau (who won, and later became the first premier of Quebec) spoke from the steps of Saint-Roch Church in Quebec City, and talked about the need for education, prosperity through industry, and responsible government. Today the Liberals have nothing memorable to say about democracy, industrial policy, or education, and stand poorly in Francophone Quebec.

At his caucus retreat, Michael Ignatieff talked about the big red Liberal tent, where all Canadians could find a place. It is fair to ask: to do what?

Duncan Cameron writes weekly on politics, and is president of

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.