I was recently invited to speak at an event put on by Gen Why Media Project called the "Why We Do It Party". What made the event interesting, besides the eclectic mix of speakers, creative performers, and participants, was that speakers were asked to talk about why we do what we do. We were asked to speak about what motivates us, rather than the usual talk about what we/our organizations do, our accomplishments etc.
It was nice being forced to step back from the day-to-day excitement of OpenMedia.ca's Stop The Meter campaign and actually take a moment to remember what got me started in the first place, and reflect on what keeps me engaged and motivated now.
Considering my work, the question really boiled down to why I care about the open and accessible Internet. It was an ideal time to contemplate this question as phone and cable companies had recently stepped up their efforts unleash new Internet usage fees that would fundamentally change how the Internet works. I find the question interesting because I'm sure the answer is different for each one of us.
For some it might be about consuming content of your choice, for others it might be the ability to share your art, to connect with family and friends via skype, download baby pictures, to debate on forums, for research, learning and self development, gaming, to facilitate meet ups around an area of interest, and innumerous other activities.
So while I came up with my answer for the Gen Why event, it made me curious as to what others would say if the question were put to them. So I put a call out on my blog and the OpenMedia.ca Facebook page to see what people had to say.
The answers I got were as diverse as Canadians are themselves. Some common themes were: Benefits to humanity, education, free expression, dissatisfaction with traditional Media, and my personal favorite, the Internet is basically everything.
Some people offered touching personal stories: "I am on a disability for brain trauma. I have had the opportunity through the use of online learning and special programs to attain a "B" average in university: academic writing, psychology, anthropology and several courses in behavioral analysis, and autism support. My goal is to become a support person for others who may also have challenges. It would mean the loss of my ability to forward my education and be of service to others if I were charged for Internet usage as well access."
Advertising
Others found that the political and empowering dimension of the Internet resonated most: "We are in an information age, where we know more about anything then any previous generation. We can call out the corrupt, we can prove truths, and fight for change. All at our fingertips."
The Internet is also looked at as more of a practical tool for innovation: "My job (a high tech, small, mobile company) flat-out needs the Internet to innovate and connect with clients. We are small and just starting up. This would definitely stifle our ability to teleconference, skype, etc with clients."
"As a student in university or college, the Internet is definitely worth saving. Students already pay ridiculous amounts of fees for tuition, and on top of that, books, transportation, food, etc. with little or no help from our gov't. Making them also PAY more for Internet access is another obstacle for them in obtaining their goals."
Some people feel the Internet is most worth saving because of its ability to make us better as a species: "I think the Internet is important because it has both helped to create/facilitate/flourish a more insightful, compelled, curious, motivated, diversely knowledgeable, productive, and inspired breed of humans." (oh, this is me!)
Others expressed wonderment: "I am a normal adult who grew up in the days before there was any such thing as an Internet. I never would have believed that all this is possible and it has changed the world in both good ways and bad. However, I believe that the Internet has changed the world in at least one very good way -- and that is in our ability to share with each other."
These comments are just the tip of the iceberg and you can check out the rest yourself on Facebook.
For me, the efforts to close the open Internet (by metering or throttling) are a war on sharing, a war on creativity, and ultimately a war on human potential. Perhaps I'm a bit too much of a romantic for my own good, but I think the Internet can bring out the best of the human spirit. I think it has the capacity to reflect back at us and encourage us to reach for a more just, engaging, and democratic society. The Internet itself will not solve the world's problems, but it does help break down barriers between us making it easier to collaborate and self organize. It helps us transcend isolation.
In a world that can feel economically and ecologically precarious, the Internet represents opportunity and hope. Open communication holds the possibility that our ingenuity and creativity could lead to a future that we get to shape and define. It's the freedom to connect in new ways.
Saving the Internet is important to me because it holds the possibility for a better world. Lets not let that possibility slip away.
Steve Anderson is the national coordinator of OpenMedia.ca.
Reach him at:
steve@openmedia.ca
http://www.facebooksteve.com
http://www.steveontwitter.com
http://openmedia.ca/SteveAnderson
Media Links is a syndicated column supported by Common Ground, TheTyee, rabble.ca,and VUE Weekly.
Ah to fight the signup battles to get a voice. Sure beats giving 100% of our voice to an elected MP every 5 YEARS for 100% of our decisions we'd want over that term (even thoughh they never met us before, lmao)
To me, the Internet is going to change how the Government does it's laws and policy that's contracted to everyone, willing or not.
I figure the public voting on proposed laws or existing laws like antipatriot acts or whatnot, simply downvote the bad ones on yer iPhone and bbe done /w them. We still never found any bad people involved /w that big hoax (imo, hoax)....but we sure put in tons of laws no one wanted b/c of it.
Happens all the time. The reason I don't worry? B/C one day the public WILL be able to upvote/downvote laws with the amount of needed times before the House of Commons is even allowed to vote on it.
Our bottleneck of politicians pretending they care is going to get changed around. I hope they area treated like pro athletes for our laws. It'd also be nice if they went in the Octagon over Bill C72 to REALLY battle it out. haha. :)
Nice text editor in the replies rabble.ca (don't hink I don't notice! ;)
My quest is for Daily Voting and Open Source Government. Found out about Open Media and added it to my website for worthy causes. Can't just cap something for no reason when it was running fine before at unlimited bandwidth! Quarterly profits are important but come on now!
I believe one day 7 billion could upvote, hell, even upvote /w paid dollar per vote into humanitarian projects. Credit Card/Pay Pal into system for worthy goals. Being sure that the projects that are helping get the funds they need. (I saw a fracking America's Got Talent where you could vote 10 times or something from yer cell, 1 dollar per call, b/c THAT'S important, lmao)
But the idea was sound, dollar votes are a great idea if used properly. I'd put in 20/month and pick 20 cool topics to give that dollar value to while reading the news of what dollars went in already went into.
So maybe one day my goals will reach as many upvotes as Steve's UBB goal gets, nearly 500,000 people took the time to vote against capping unlimited Internet. To me that screams that everyone DOES want to vote alongside their leaders before RIAAtarded laws get pushed on us.
If you think the risk of a Linux box being hacked for your votes sucks, imagine having to wait 5 YEARS for someone to vote 100% for you, even tho they never met you! ;)
Live for the swarm!
www.opensourceg.com
Before adding to the glowing comments about Facebook, readers might want to pay attention to the vulnerability of centalized services by hearing what expert Eben Moglen has to say. Here's an excerpt from his Feb 5, 2011 keynote speech at the 2011 FOSDEM Meeting in Brussels:
"If we are going to build systems of communication for future politics, we're going to have to build them under the assumption that the network is not only untrusted, but untrustworthy. And we're going to have to build under the assumption that centralized services can kill you. We can't fool around about this. We can't let Facebook dance up and down about their privacy policy. That's ludicrous. We have to replace the things that create vulnerability and lure our colleagues around the world into using them to make freedom, only to dicover that the promise is easily broken by a kill switch."
To read more: Eben Moglen: "Centralized services like Facebook can kill you