Obama's unconstitutional surveillance policies wrong the U.S. Bill of Rights

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

You can change the conversation. Chip in to rabble's donation drive today!

President Barack Obama proclaimed Dec. 15 Bill of Rights Day, praising those first 10 amendments to the U.S. Constitution as "the foundation of American liberty, securing our most fundamental rights -- from the freedom to speak, assemble and practice our faith as we please to the protections that ensure justice under the law." The next day, U.S. District Judge Richard J. Leon called Obama's surveillance policies "almost Orwellian" in a court order finding the National Security Agency's bulk collection of Americans' telephone metadata very likely unconstitutional. If that was not enough, the president's own task force on the issues, the Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies, delivered its report, which the White House released, with 46 recommendations for changes.

One adviser to the panel, Sascha Meinrath of the Open Technology Institute, was skeptical, telling me that "intelligence-community insiders, administration officials, comprise the entirety of this five-member group. I do not see how you can do a truly independent review of surveillance when so many people are tied in." The panel is chaired by former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell, and is managed under the auspices of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, run by James Clapper. Clapper is widely considered to have lied in a Senate hearing on this issue. When asked by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., if the NSA collected phone records on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans, Clapper replied, "No, sir." Following the Snowden leaks, Clapper admitted to NBC News that his answer was the "least untruthful" manner to say no.

Judge Leon's ruling relates to just one of several filed after the June disclosures by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden about the vast, global surveillance system vacuuming up personal data from billions of people. A separate federal lawsuit in New York, ACLU v. Clapper, seeks to end the mass surveillance completely, and to have all the data collected so far deleted.

Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, called Edward Snowden "a patriot," noting: "As a whistle-blower of illegal government activity that was sanctioned and kept secret by the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government for years, he undertook great personal risk for the public good. And he has single-handedly reignited a global debate about the extent and nature of government surveillance and our most fundamental rights as individuals."

Jay Carney, Obama's press secretary, reiterated the White House's hard line this week: "Mr. Snowden has been accused of leaking classified information, and he faces felony charges here in the United States."

Currently in Russia, halfway through a year of temporary asylum he was granted there, Edward Snowden this week issued a public letter to the people of Brazil, in hopes of gaining permanent asylum there. In the letter, Snowden wrote, "Six months ago, I stepped out from the shadows of the United States Government's National Security Agency to stand in front of a journalist's camera ... with open eyes, knowing that the decision would cost me family and my home, and would risk my life. I was motivated by a belief that the citizens of the world deserve to understand the system in which they live." He continued: "My greatest fear was that no one would listen to my warning. Never have I been so glad to have been so wrong."

The world continues to listen to Snowden. As he also said in his open letter, "The culture of indiscriminate worldwide surveillance, exposed to public debates and real investigations on every continent, is collapsing." A recent poll suggests at least 55 per cent of those questioned consider Snowden a whistleblower. Despite the polls, CNN anchor Brooke Baldwin blustered about potential amnesty for Snowden: "This is a hated man, what would he even do here?"

Adopted on Dec. 15, 1791, the Bill of Rights comprises the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. While praising it last week and ticking through "our most fundamental rights," President Obama failed to mention the Fourth Amendment. It reads:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Perhaps President Obama, the erstwhile constitutional law professor, should go back and reread that amendment.

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories like these coming!

Denis Moynihan contributed research to this column.

Amy Goodman is the host of Democracy Now!,  a daily international TV/radio news hour airing on more than 1,000 stations in North America. She is the co-author of The Silenced Majority, a New York Times bestseller.

Photo: Eugene Chan/flickr

Related Items

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.