A helping hand in Washington

Paul Martin went to Washington for two days last week. Before leaving, he saw the U.S. President for a 20 minute meeting, followed by a four-question press conference, and photos with wives. The Martins stayed for lunch. The U.S. media ignored the visit. The Canadian prime minister was followed closely throughout his full schedule by the Canadian media.

So did Martin only go to the U.S. capital to show himself to Canadian voters?

Canadians know that conducting relations with the U.S. is a big part of what a national government does. Auditioning for the job of prime minister means passing the gravitas test. Does the candidate exhibit seriousness of purpose in pursuit of Canadian goals when meeting the American president?

Martin failed the test. There was no outcome from the White House meeting, other than to show that George W. Bush knew Martin's name. At the press conference, all four questions went to Bush. The two American questioners asked questions on Iraq; the news was about Bush's reaction to the famous photos showing how Americans were treating their prisoners. (He condemned the action). The two Canadian questioners did not miss the chance to question Bush. Martin's spoken role was to translate Bush into French.

Martin was still able to come up with some bad ideas however. On day one, he trotted out one of his pet projects at a luncheon address on Canadian foreign policy. He wants to see a political G20 of heads of governments to mirror the G20 which is made up of finance ministers. Martin suggested that the new G20 would allow for political leaders to speak freely without set speeches. (The next day allowed for set speeches on the White House lawn, so presumably he does not want to eliminate them altogether).

For Martin, political leadership is needed to bypass bureaucracy, and make real progress on issues such as the WTO (Doha round) trade negotiations, or reconstruction of Iraq. This means bringing world leaders (plus translators) together to sit around a table and talk.In the last two years strong opposition to the Western agenda for world trade and finance has emerged from an important new alliance of China, India, Brazil and South Africa. The G20 idea is designed to bring this under control before it can rally the support of most of the world. Putting the four powers of the South into a grouping with the G7 countries would allow the West to work out a divide-and-conquer strategy.

The G20 would include countries such as Mexico, South Korea, Indonesia, Nigeria and the Ukraine, along with the current G8. Getting a chance to arm twist, browbeat, threaten and otherwise attempt to exploit differences among the only countries able to establish an independent program for world development would be a real triumph for U.S. foreign policy. Whatever differences Washington has with old Europe, uniting around corporate globalization is not one of them.

The G20 idea has the support of the influential Institute on International Economics, a true Washington insider group well connected to Ottawa. It pushed the U.S. agenda on free trade with Canada, and the NAFTA. They are happy to see Martin doing some of the lifting on this idea. The Canadian business chieftains who were down sniffing the cherry blossoms along the Potomac the week before Martin like the G20 idea. It fits with the Davos, IMF, way of making the world safe for profitable investment.

So Martin was not just looking to put himself on pre-election display. He was also intent on reminding the U.S. establishment he could carry their ball should they want to call his number.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.