Making the leap: the environment vs. convenience

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

It has been interesting to read the comments being made in therun up to the Throne Speech from BC's government this week.

Everybody from business to labour to environmental groups and allof their assorted special interest organizations have something tosay about what they want it to say. And the government of coursehas been telling us that it is full of goodies. Mostly what it boilsdown to is pipe dreams from those with their hands out, and theusual political BS from the government.

Of particular note among the topics being bandied about are whatis being said about the environment and the economy. Theenvironmental organizations and most citizens want somethingmore positive done about the environment, particularly globalwarming. The business community wants to see a growingeconomy. The government is promising both. It is like promisingone can have their cake and eat it too, or like a promisethat one can win the lottery without ever buying a ticket.

The business community, of course, wants to see more economicgrowth and less taxes. Like hogs at the trough their only realconcern is to eat regardless of what happens to anyone else. Theissue is that the main reason we have environmentalproblems is because we have economic growth and the increasingpopulation that both stimulates growth and is a result ofit. In fact in the past century we have had so much growth that weare killing ourselves — consuming more globally than we cansustainably produce — much like a run-away cancer spreadingthrough a body.

A responsible government would not be looking to stimulate moregrowth. Instead they would be developing policies to reversegrowth and cut down on exploitation to the point that the planetcould once again produce more than was being consumed. Beingowned and operated by big business, there is fat chance that anycurrent government would be allowed to do that.

Environmental organizations, for the most part, understand whatthe problem is, but don't have the guts to push for real solutions. Acase in point is the government's proposal for a carbon tax.Nothing more than a shell game that penalizes those in middle andlower income brackets who will be hard put to pay the taxes, whileleaving the wealthy free to continue creating greenhouse gasses totheir heart's content, albeit at a bit higher cost. A carbon tax byitself is little more than another class-based policy that puts thegreatest burden on those who can least afford it. But, from abusiness controlled government, what else could one expect?

So, why do the Sierra Club and other organizations climb on boardthe government's carbon tax band wagon when it is little more thana bad joke? In a conversation with the representative of oneorganization the answer was that is was better than nothing. Sadlyit is also not much more than nothing, if not worse than nothing.One must wonder if economists and business interests havegained control of our environmental watchdogs. Or, maybe theyhave just lost sight of how important the issue of global warmingreally is?

One environmental issue that has been receiving some discussionlately is that of the huge dead zone in the Pacific Ocean off of theOregon coast. Every summer since 2002 about 1000 square milesof ocean off of Oregon which once was one of the world's mostproductive marine areas has suffered severe oxygen reduction,resulting in a marine wasteland littered with dead sea life.Researchers at Oregon State University suspect that weatherchanges due to global warming are a factor.

The loss of fisheries off of our waters is but one of many changesthat we are seeing that may be linked to the volume of carbongasses that we put into the atmosphere as we generate electricity,operate motor vehicles, air planes, ships and other things.

The answer to this problem is not merely making the creation ofcarbon gasses more expensive as a carbon tax would do. And itcertainly isn't the silly carbon trading schemes that have been putforward that move gas production form one place to another. Theanswer is to produce much, much less carbon gas, somethingwhich will not be achieved until there is a firm carbon cap in placewith no trading that says we produce this much gas and no more.And a policy that halts and reverses growth so that there is lessdemand for energy.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.