Stephen Harper's Quebec coalition

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

Jean Charest has rolled out the pre-election advertising, presented star candidates to the press, and the Quebec Liberal Party just got the polling numbers it wanted to see (at 36 per cent, a five point advance over the Parti Québecois, according to Leger Marketing) so a late March, early April election seems certain.

The battle on the hustings between the new PQ leader André Boisclair and Charest is much anticipated. It looks to be personal, dredging up cocaine use by Boisclair when he was a cabinet minister, and the tone will get nasty quickly. With the Liberals trailing the PQ in the polls for most of its time in government, the PQ expected to exact easy revenge for its defeat at the hands of Charest four years ago.

At one point, the PQ had the support of over 50 per cent of Quebec voters. Now, Boisclair appears to be the weakest PQ leader ever, staggering under the weight of carrying the national aspirations of his party, and the Liberals have reason to hope a strong campaign will offset their poor performance in government.

The election has a lot riding on it. Boisclair and the PQ are anti-federalist, and want to hold a winning third referendum. A PQ electoral victory would put the national unity issue front and centre in Ottawa, giving Stéphane Dion a considerable advantage (given his public ownership of the unity file) in the next federal election, anticipated as early as this spring.

Stephen Harper wants to help Jean Charest, a former federal Conservative leader, claim a second mandate. Harper is prepared to risk alienating some supporters west of the Ottawa river to do it, by giving a public profile to his plan to increase federal fiscal transfers to Quebec. The first step was this week with Harper and Charest doing a photo op to announce, again, that Ottawa was providing money for a green fund that will benefit Quebec.

But Harper also has a second runner in the Quebec election race, Mario Dumont and the Action Démocratique (ADQ) which worked hard for Harper in the last election, and helped deliver him his ten Quebec seats. The ADQ holds five seats in the National Assembly and its territory was fertile ground for the Harper Conservatives.

Dumont looks better as a potential Prime Minister than either Charest or Boisclair, according to Quebec pollster Leger Marketing. Their latest poll had the ADQ at 21 per cent, ten points behind the PQ.

Under the rules of the Quebec National Assembly, a party cannot claim party status unless it has at least 12 seats. This is the same number of seats required in Ottawa which has 308 members, compared to 125 in Quebec.

At any one time, there have never been more than two official parties in the Quebec legislature. This may well change if support for Dumont holds. Quebec could be headed for a minority government, with Dumont holding the balance of power.

In the 1995 referendum, the ADQ lined up with the PQ on the “yes” side. Dumont has since refused to support another vote on sovereignty.

Since it was originally a breakaway group from the Bourassa-era Liberal party, forging an alliance with the ADQ would have been the obvious way for Charest to rebuild federalist fortunes in Quebec. But, Charest did not have the political foresight or ability to bring Dumont on board, though he had what he needed to reach an agreement. For instance, Charest could have made Dumont deputy leader, with a clear shot at being premier eventually.

Harper is the one building a coalition of provincial supporters for his Conservatives among Quebec Liberals and the ADQ. If Charest falls short election night, it will be because he allowed Mario Dumont to play the spoiler, instead of bringing him back into the Quebec Liberal fold. Imitating Harper's Quebec coalition would have served him well in any event.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.