babble-intro-img
babble is rabble.ca's discussion board but it's much more than that: it's an online community for folks who just won't shut up. It's a place to tell each other — and the world — what's up with our work and campaigns.

Leaving Babble for awhile

136 replies [Last post]

Comments

saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006
Cueball wrote:

The law is this:

Quote:
any audio recording that has as its dominant characteristic the description, presentation or representation, for a sexual purpose, of sexual activity with a person under the age of eighteen years that would be an offence under this Act

What do you supposed Speare's song writer meant when he wrote her the line: "Do me one more time."

A 17 year old can be sexual if she chooses.

It's not porn.

This is the beginning of the argument ... "Well if she hadn't acted so sexy ... ".

That's what some pedophiles say about toddlers.

It's a non-starter, cueball. Give it up.

 


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006

Cueball wrote:
Well that's great. Thanks for posting it. So I just post that Britney video there, and they will take care of it, right?

It isn't porn.

So ... it's too much trouble for you to report all those images of children being sexually abused that fall on your hard drive by accident, placing you at risk of unjustified search, seizure and arrest ... 

... but you'll report a non-porn Brittany Spears video?

 I think you need to do a little work on your priorities.

 


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

I disagree. I think that Britney was manipulated and abused by her manager and her label, and they coerced her into doing thing that she would likely have felt uncomfortable doing. They also offered her rewards and encouraged her to act provactively in front of the camera, and told her exactly what to sing, and hired a choreographer to tell her exactly how to act, and also a wardrobe artist to give her a sexually explicit wardrobe, possibly even threatening her with the loss of her "contract" if she did not behave as they asked. Recent events and her public behaviour are consistent with the behaviour of someone who has been abused

 


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006

Cueball wrote:

I disagree. I think that Britney was manipulated and abused by her manager and her label, and they coerced her into doing thing that she would likely have felt uncomfortable doing. They also offered her rewards and encouraged her to act provactively in front of the camera, and told her exactly what to sing, and hired a choreographer to tell her exactly how to act, and also a wardrobe artist to give her a sexually explicit wardrobe, possibly even threatening her with the loss of her "contract" if she did not behave as they asked. Recent events and her public behaviour are consistent with the behaviour of someone who has been abused

 

 

HEY! You might be right!So you have a case for child abuse, but it's not porn. Most teenagers dance like that. So do preteens.

But ... Forget the children being sexually abused, eh?

It's much more important to report a sexy Brittany Spears video.

Ya, you go cueball!

Let me know how that works out, eh?

Then ... maybe go through your hardrive and report some of those too? Or no? Too much trouble?

https://www.cybertip.ca/app/en/report

Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

I am right. I know I am right.


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006

all those images of children being sexually abused that fall on your hard drive by accident, placing you at risk of unjustified search, seizure and arrest ...

And as for your hidden personal insult ... "dickhead" is a pretty stupid thing to call a woman. Kinda loses its meaning!

Clearly your vocabulary is as limited as your ...


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006
Cueball wrote:

I am right. I know I am right.

About what?

That Brittany was a victim of child abuse?

Likely. (Prove it)

That her video is "porn"?

No.

 


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

But billions of dollars made by the music and fashion industry have convinced you that child abuse is really something that only happens hidden away in some dark corner in some basement somewhere, while they have been indoctrinating you to think that Britany is just "dancing" because she "chose" to.

You're a laff.


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

Did you look at the sparkle motion video I posted?


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006
Cueball wrote:

But billions of dollars made by the music and fashion industry have convinced you that child abuse is really something that only happens hidden away in some dark corner in some basement somewhere, while they have been indoctrinating you to think that Britaney is just "dancing" because she "chose" to.

The discussion is about child sexual abuse and child porn.

Yes, I think Brittany likes dancing. Most teens do. Preteens too. It's not porn.

Well, I know you love to argue ad infinitum about useless things, and this is getting ridiculous, so just carry on without me, eh?

 


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

Filming teens saying and doing lewd things in order excite people sexually and sell it to them is porn. In the case of the Speares video, its "soft" porn, but it involves a minor, so it is child "soft" porn. It doesn't matter if you produce it in your basement, or if Warner does it on a soundstage.

Britany can dance and do whatever she pleases, but as soon as someone picked up a camera and "directed" her and put her on that sound stage,   saying and doing lewd things and sold it they were making porn.


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006

Ok, all rock and pop music videos are soft porn ... in your world. HOLY CRAP!! ... and you've got youtube links all over your computer! ... wait! ... I hear the sirens now! ... Yup! They're coming to get you cueball!

lmao

"Yup he's right over here, officer! Take him away! Please! "

rotflmao

 

 


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

Now you are getting it. They are having Britany make an adult style soft porn video. In other words engaging a minor in performing in a porn video.


saga
Offline
Joined: Aug 5 2006

Cueball wrote:
Now you are getting it. They are having Britany make an adult style soft porn video. In other words engaging a minor in performing in a porn video.

"Take him away .... pleeeeeez officer!"

 lol

Oh ya, and take his computer too. He thinks it's infected with child porn.

lmao


Cueball
Offline
Joined: Dec 23 2003

They enticed her with money fame and fortune, then made her do these lewd things in front of a camera, and threatened her with the loss of all that money fame and fortune, when she balked, and she performed willingly (?) and then when she grew up, and started to want to determine her own life, they broke her, since she was all used up as a child sex star and took away all her things, and her contract, embarassed her, and made her an object of fun in the media.

And the fans loved it. But as for the dirty old men in the sleezebag hotels yeah... the fans agree... hang the "perps".


Michelle
Online
Joined: May 10 2001

Long thread.  Let's continue the discussion about what could improve babble here:

http://rabble.ca/babble/rabble-reactions/babble-finished

And let's continue the discussion about child pornography laws and enforcement and potential for abuse of process here:

http://rabble.ca/babble/national-news/ayad-mejid-terrorist-pedophile-or


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Login or register to post comments