Ghislaine
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 15957
Joined: Feb 15 2008

I agree it is ridiculous and unjust Catchfire. But there are tons of situations like this. GM.s CEO just made away like a bandit. What does Bombardier's CEO make? They just layed off thousands in Montreal on the same they posted profit. Should his (or her..not sure) house be attacked? Bombardier's receives millions in corporate welfare. Would Michelle call attacking his house laudable?

 

ETA: It is Pierre Beaudoin and here is what he said yesterday~

Quote:

The announced layoffs are now expected to be about 4,360.

The cuts will be made at the company's facilities in Canada, the United States, Mexico and Northern Ireland by the end of 2009.

Bombardier, the world's third-largest maker of commercial aircraft, said it expects the demand for business aircraft to remain weak for the foreseeable future.

The announcement came as Bombardier reported that its full-year profit reached $1 billion US for the first time, topping the $317 million the company made in its last fiscal year. Bombardier's revenues for the year rose 13 per cent year-over-year to $19.7 billion.

"During the past year, we more than held our own as the world's financial markets tumbled and the global economy weakened," said company president and CEO Pierre Beaudoin.

For the fourth quarter, Bombardier made a profit of $309 million, or 17 cents a share, on revenue of $5.4 billion. In the same quarter of its previous fiscal year, the company reported earnings of $218 million, or 12 cents a share, on revenue of $5.3 billion.


Violence or property damage at protests By: Michelle (103 replies) April 2, 2009 - 10:27am
  • statica wrote:one thing, By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 2:14pm)
  • Or do the "organizers" of By: Caissa (Apr 2 2009 - 2:12pm)
  • I agree with you about that, By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 2:12pm)
  • That Ghandi...he never By: Ghislaine (Apr 2 2009 - 2:23pm)
  • Caissa wrote: This thread is By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 2:08pm)
  • I have to agree with By: statica (Apr 2 2009 - 2:05pm)
  • Re: Violence or property damage at protests By: Caissa (Apr 2 2009 - 2:02pm)
  • N.R.KISSED wrote:I also By: ElizaQ (Apr 2 2009 - 2:00pm)
  • Michelle,I 'm sorry if my By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 2:04pm)
  • Michelle wrote: Isn't there By: M. Spector (Apr 2 2009 - 1:59pm)
  • I don't understand what By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 1:56pm)
  • Michelle wrote: Sure. The By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 1:54pm)
  • It's Me D wrote:Could you By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 1:47pm)
  • Those are good points, about By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 1:45pm)
  • I think Judy's comments are By: N.R.KISSED (Apr 2 2009 - 1:38pm)
  • Banjo wrote: The only By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 1:35pm)
  • Re: Violence or property damage at protests By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 1:32pm)
  • In response to the thread By: M. Spector (Apr 2 2009 - 1:28pm)
  • Re: Violence or property damage at protests By: Caissa (Apr 2 2009 - 1:27pm)
  • I wonder what those who By: Banjo (Apr 2 2009 - 1:25pm)
  • Good question, Caissa, and By: Maysie (Apr 2 2009 - 1:22pm)
  • Re: Violence or property damage at protests By: Caissa (Apr 2 2009 - 1:14pm)
  • Michelle wrote: That to me By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 1:12pm)
  • Ghislaine wrote: I was at By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 1:04pm)
  • Joey, I am referencing the By: statica (Apr 2 2009 - 12:59pm)
  • I have to say its obvious By: It's Me D (Apr 2 2009 - 12:55pm)
  • Hmm...If someone makes the By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 12:45pm)
  • Statica said:   "Joey's By: Joey Ramone (Apr 2 2009 - 12:53pm)
  • Maysie wrote: My argument in By: Ghislaine (Apr 2 2009 - 12:39pm)
  • Joey's post highlights the By: statica (Apr 2 2009 - 12:28pm)
  • My argument in support of By: Maysie (Apr 2 2009 - 11:43am)
  • I completely agree with Judy By: Joey Ramone (Apr 2 2009 - 10:59am)
  • Quote:It's unlikely the By: Frustrated Mess (Apr 2 2009 - 10:54am)
  • I went to a protest a few By: Refuge (Apr 2 2009 - 10:54am)
  • Property damage was very By: martin dufresne (Apr 2 2009 - 10:59am)