Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: martin dufresne (102 replies) April 2, 2009 - 3:12pmmartin dufresne wrote:
Hi By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 2:26pm) Makwa wrote:
Feather Sky By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 2:24pm) Michelle wrote:
Feather Sky, By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 2:18pm) Makwa, will get back to you By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:50pm) Martin,
You are no more By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:44pm) Makwa wrote:
European women By: RosaL (Apr 6 2009 - 1:35pm) remind wrote:
Makwa, I am By: Makwa (Apr 6 2009 - 1:31pm) Even if she won't go to a By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 1:19pm) martin: she was, but in the By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 1:15pm) Ghislaine wrote:
I thought By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 1:14pm) martin dufresne By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:13pm) Thanks for the By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 12:54pm) Ghislaine, Feather Sky By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 12:47pm) I thought people might care By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 12:32pm) Ghislaine wrote:I don't want By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 12:30pm) martin dufresne wrote:I By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 12:17pm) Makwa, I am very torn by By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 11:54am) Oh gosh! By: Cueball (Apr 6 2009 - 11:23am) I don't want to link to it By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 11:15am) Hi Feather Sky. I wrote By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 9:52am) Feather Sky wrote:
Do you By: Makwa (Apr 6 2009 - 7:53am) Feather Sky, I wasn't By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 6:08am) Thank you for the support. By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 1:39am) I agree too. Thanks for By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 1:26am) Well, you know, I agree By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 12:57am) Forcing women to conceive By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 12:17am) I wouldn't go that far. It By: Michelle (Apr 5 2009 - 10:43pm) uh?... By: martin dufresne (Apr 5 2009 - 10:36pm) How prepostourous.
Just when By: Feather Sky (Apr 5 2009 - 10:33pm) Sorry if this was unclear By: martin dufresne (Apr 4 2009 - 4:19pm) Are you saying Jessica Yee By: remind (Apr 4 2009 - 3:58pm) Re: Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: martin dufresne (Apr 2 2009 - 7:55pm) Re: Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 2 2009 - 6:14pm) ""...Meanwhile, women on the By: remind (Apr 2 2009 - 3:53pm) Yeah. We'll never be done By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 3:25pm)
- Geegoshdarnit, wish this By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 9:03pm)
- martin wrote:First a "fetus By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 8:35pm)
- Ghislaine, we all know there By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 8:24pm)
- martin - He stated that By: Ghislaine (Apr 7 2009 - 7:13pm)
- Regarding first paragraph, By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 7:07pm)
- To Remind and By: Hoodeet (Apr 7 2009 - 6:55pm)
- Yes, I suppose you are By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 5:58pm)
- Remind, please don't let By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 5:39pm)
- Well, it seems then that at By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 5:28pm)
- Thank you Michelle for your By: Ghislaine (Apr 7 2009 - 4:45pm)
- Beyond any horror, By: Slumberjack (Apr 7 2009 - 5:32pm)
- Hoodeet, I would disagree By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 3:39pm)
- The point remains, that By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 3:32pm)
- I am 100% pro choice, but By: Hoodeet (Apr 7 2009 - 3:16pm)
- I understand where you're By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 3:14pm)
- I don't think you By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 2:55pm)
- martin, there is no By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 2:46pm)
- Caissa, "...That does not By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 2:25pm)
- martin dufresne By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 2:24pm)
- "Your scenario doesn't By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 2:21pm)
- Timebandit used the word By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 2:21pm)
- I understand your concern, By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 2:18pm)
- (Edited for By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 2:19pm)
- Let me get this straight, By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 2:09pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: By By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 1:59pm)
- If the defense of late By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 1:56pm)
- Are you? By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 1:55pm)
- Are you be deliberately By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 1:53pm)
- Ghislaine's first line in By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 1:52pm)
- By what logic? Who says By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 1:48pm)
- Michelle, ghislaine has been By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 1:50pm)
- By that logic, Chantale By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 1:49pm)
- Ditto what Caissa said. By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 1:27pm)
- Is there an applause Smiley By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 1:28pm)
- Ghislaine, the point is, By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 12:39pm)
- (Relayed by the PUSH Journal By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 10:54am)
- Why don't we re-open the By: Feather Sky (Apr 7 2009 - 9:57am)
- Ghislaine, seriously piss By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 8:06am)
- I don't support compelling By: Ghislaine (Apr 7 2009 - 7:29am)
- Point taken hoodeet, and I By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 6:04am)
- My two cents: 1. I don't By: Hoodeet (Apr 6 2009 - 11:39pm)
- I argued that contrary to By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 11:42pm)
- I'm sorry Michelle but you By: RevolutionPlease (Apr 6 2009 - 11:12pm)
- I don't get it. Women have By: RevolutionPlease (Apr 6 2009 - 11:06pm)
- remind wrote: No it is not By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 10:57pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: "Take By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 10:50pm)
- Quote: feather sky, where By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 10:41pm)
- I don't think the Supreme By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 7:59pm)
- No it is not valid actually, By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 7:50pm)
- And do you have any By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 7:51pm)
- martin - not forcibly By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 7:45pm)
- "Take Feather Sky's tack and By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 7:40pm)
- remind wrote: OFFS! Who in By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 7:36pm)
- Again OFFS! By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 6:47pm)
- Ghislaine: "...At this By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 6:44pm)
- Feather Sky wrote: In By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 6:34pm)
- OFFS! Who in fact is By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 6:18pm)
- remind wrote: Well, By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 5:13pm)
- Timebandit wrote: Quote: ... By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 4:49pm)
- Well, timebandit we will By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 4:18pm)
- Quote: ... that millions of By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 3:48pm)
- Michelle, please do consider By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 3:43pm)
- I'm one of the moderators, By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 3:23pm)
- feather sky, in actual fact, By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 3:22pm)
- Ghislaine, I find your By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:12pm)
- Makwa wrote:I cannot By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 3:41pm)
- Ghislaine wrote: I thought By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 2:29pm)
How prepostourous.
Just when you think Canada has a slight chance of becoming progressive, they allow people to publish this sort of hatred encouraging the slavery of women. This should be illegal and the author of the article, as well as the editors of Chatelaine should be brought up on charges of hate crimes.