Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: martin dufresne (102 replies) April 2, 2009 - 4:12pmmartin dufresne wrote:
Hi By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:26pm) Makwa wrote:
Feather Sky By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:24pm) Michelle wrote:
Feather Sky, By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:18pm) Makwa, will get back to you By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 2:50pm) Martin,
You are no more By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 2:44pm) Makwa wrote:
European women By: RosaL (Apr 6 2009 - 2:35pm) remind wrote:
Makwa, I am By: Makwa (Apr 6 2009 - 2:31pm) Even if she won't go to a By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 2:19pm) martin: she was, but in the By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 2:15pm) Ghislaine wrote:
I thought By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 2:14pm) martin dufresne By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 2:13pm) Thanks for the By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:54pm) Ghislaine, Feather Sky By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 1:47pm) I thought people might care By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 1:32pm) Ghislaine wrote:I don't want By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:30pm) martin dufresne wrote:I By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:17pm) Makwa, I am very torn by By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 12:54pm) Oh gosh! By: Cueball (Apr 6 2009 - 12:23pm) I don't want to link to it By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 12:15pm) Hi Feather Sky. I wrote By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 10:52am) Feather Sky wrote:
Do you By: Makwa (Apr 6 2009 - 8:53am) Feather Sky, I wasn't By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 7:08am) Thank you for the support. By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 2:39am) I agree too. Thanks for By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 2:26am) Well, you know, I agree By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:57am) Forcing women to conceive By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 1:17am) I wouldn't go that far. It By: Michelle (Apr 5 2009 - 11:43pm) uh?... By: martin dufresne (Apr 5 2009 - 11:36pm) How prepostourous.
Just when By: Feather Sky (Apr 5 2009 - 11:33pm) Sorry if this was unclear By: martin dufresne (Apr 4 2009 - 5:19pm) Are you saying Jessica Yee By: remind (Apr 4 2009 - 4:58pm) Re: Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: martin dufresne (Apr 2 2009 - 8:55pm) Re: Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 2 2009 - 7:14pm) ""...Meanwhile, women on the By: remind (Apr 2 2009 - 4:53pm) Yeah. We'll never be done By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 4:25pm)
- Geegoshdarnit, wish this By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 10:03pm)
- martin wrote:First a "fetus By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 9:35pm)
- Ghislaine, we all know there By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 9:24pm)
- martin - He stated that By: Ghislaine (Apr 7 2009 - 8:13pm)
- Regarding first paragraph, By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 8:07pm)
- To Remind and By: Hoodeet (Apr 7 2009 - 7:55pm)
- Yes, I suppose you are By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 6:58pm)
- Remind, please don't let By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 6:39pm)
- Well, it seems then that at By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 6:28pm)
- Thank you Michelle for your By: Ghislaine (Apr 7 2009 - 5:45pm)
- Beyond any horror, By: Slumberjack (Apr 7 2009 - 6:32pm)
- Hoodeet, I would disagree By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 4:39pm)
- The point remains, that By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 4:32pm)
- I am 100% pro choice, but By: Hoodeet (Apr 7 2009 - 4:16pm)
- I understand where you're By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 4:14pm)
- I don't think you By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 3:55pm)
- martin, there is no By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 3:46pm)
- Caissa, "...That does not By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 3:25pm)
- martin dufresne By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 3:24pm)
- "Your scenario doesn't By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 3:21pm)
- Timebandit used the word By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 3:21pm)
- I understand your concern, By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 3:18pm)
- (Edited for By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 3:19pm)
- Let me get this straight, By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 3:09pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: By By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 2:59pm)
- If the defense of late By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 2:56pm)
- Are you? By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 2:55pm)
- Are you be deliberately By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 2:53pm)
- Ghislaine's first line in By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 2:52pm)
- By what logic? Who says By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 2:48pm)
- Michelle, ghislaine has been By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 2:50pm)
- By that logic, Chantale By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 2:49pm)
- Ditto what Caissa said. By: Timebandit (Apr 7 2009 - 2:27pm)
- Is there an applause Smiley By: Caissa (Apr 7 2009 - 2:28pm)
- Ghislaine, the point is, By: Michelle (Apr 7 2009 - 1:39pm)
- (Relayed by the PUSH Journal By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 11:54am)
- Why don't we re-open the By: Feather Sky (Apr 7 2009 - 10:57am)
- Ghislaine, seriously piss By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 9:06am)
- I don't support compelling By: Ghislaine (Apr 7 2009 - 8:29am)
- Point taken hoodeet, and I By: remind (Apr 7 2009 - 7:04am)
- My two cents: 1. I don't By: Hoodeet (Apr 7 2009 - 12:39am)
- I argued that contrary to By: martin dufresne (Apr 7 2009 - 12:42am)
- I'm sorry Michelle but you By: RevolutionPlease (Apr 7 2009 - 12:12am)
- I don't get it. Women have By: RevolutionPlease (Apr 7 2009 - 12:06am)
- remind wrote: No it is not By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 11:57pm)
- martin dufresne wrote: "Take By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 11:50pm)
- Quote: feather sky, where By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 11:41pm)
- I don't think the Supreme By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 8:59pm)
- No it is not valid actually, By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 8:50pm)
- And do you have any By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 8:51pm)
- martin - not forcibly By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 8:45pm)
- "Take Feather Sky's tack and By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 8:40pm)
- remind wrote: OFFS! Who in By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 8:36pm)
- Again OFFS! By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 7:47pm)
- Ghislaine: "...At this By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 7:44pm)
- Feather Sky wrote: In By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 7:34pm)
- OFFS! Who in fact is By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 7:18pm)
- remind wrote: Well, By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 6:13pm)
- Timebandit wrote: Quote: ... By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 5:49pm)
- Well, timebandit we will By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 5:18pm)
- Quote: ... that millions of By: Timebandit (Apr 6 2009 - 4:48pm)
- Michelle, please do consider By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 4:43pm)
- I'm one of the moderators, By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 4:23pm)
- feather sky, in actual fact, By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 4:22pm)
- Ghislaine, I find your By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 4:12pm)
- Makwa wrote:I cannot By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 4:41pm)
- Ghislaine wrote: I thought By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:29pm)
Forcing women to conceive against their will, and essentially making them human incubators is slavery - pure and simple.
Do you honestly think that if Chatelaine printed an article advocating for capturing Africans and using them as slaves, that it would not be clearly viewed as a hate crime?
In my mind, it's pretty clear.
All anti-choice arguments are pro-slavery and therefore a hate crime.
I didn't read the article as I won't in support such a backwards publication in any way, but whether they are advocating female slavery or simply providing a platform for hatemongers to express their opinion, it's a very thin theoretical difference.