remind
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 7289
Joined: Jun 25 2004

Well, you know, I  agree with feathersky here about forced pregnacy being slavery and that any literature promoting it,  can be seen as the promotion of slavery. Seriously think about it and what it means to be deprived of  freedom  to self determine.

Over the course of yesterday and today, I have been speaking with a woman who has had an oopsy at 37, and is pentacostal indoctrinated, though now lapsed.

Most certainly, she feels as if she was being forced to be an incubator against her will, having just had another child last year. Her partner is/was trying to force her to have it, as well as her mother. Indeed she was threatened with disassociation by both, and her partner went so far as to throw her out of the house physically when she said she was not going to continue with it, as not only does she not want it, she has almost died in childbirth twice before. He wants her pregnant and that's it, as it is a control mechanism for him, and not religion, though he is using her former religious beliefs against her to get what he wants.

Tomorrow she is going to take care of it, and if her marriage fails, she is fine with that too, as she now realizes that they do not want what is best for HER, nor do they respect her personal integrity. As really it came down to, so what if she dies and leaves her other children motherless. It is all God's will according to her mother. And her partner just wants HIS future child.

Forcing a woman to be pregnant is slavery pure and simple and it cannot be seen any other way.

 

 


Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: martin dufresne (102 replies) April 2, 2009 - 4:12pm
  • martin dufresne wrote: Hi By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:26pm)
  • Makwa wrote: Feather Sky By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:24pm)
  • Michelle wrote: Feather Sky, By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 3:18pm)
  • Makwa, will get back to you By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 2:50pm)
  • Martin, You are no more By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 2:44pm)
  • Makwa wrote: European women By: RosaL (Apr 6 2009 - 2:35pm)
  • remind wrote: Makwa, I am By: Makwa (Apr 6 2009 - 2:31pm)
  • Even if she won't go to a By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 2:19pm)
  • martin: she was, but in the By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 2:15pm)
  • Ghislaine wrote: I thought By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 2:14pm)
  • martin dufresne By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 2:13pm)
  • Thanks for the By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:54pm)
  • Ghislaine, Feather Sky By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 1:47pm)
  • I thought people might care By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 1:32pm)
  • Ghislaine wrote:I don't want By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:30pm)
  • martin dufresne wrote:I By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:17pm)
  • Makwa, I am very torn by By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 12:54pm)
  • Oh gosh! By: Cueball (Apr 6 2009 - 12:23pm)
  • I don't want to link to it By: Ghislaine (Apr 6 2009 - 12:15pm)
  • Hi Feather Sky. I wrote By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 10:52am)
  • Feather Sky wrote: Do you By: Makwa (Apr 6 2009 - 8:53am)
  • Feather Sky, I wasn't By: Michelle (Apr 6 2009 - 7:08am)
  • Thank you for the support. By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 2:39am)
  • I agree too. Thanks for By: martin dufresne (Apr 6 2009 - 2:26am)
  • Well, you know, I  agree By: remind (Apr 6 2009 - 1:57am)
  • Forcing women to conceive By: Feather Sky (Apr 6 2009 - 1:17am)
  • I wouldn't go that far.  It By: Michelle (Apr 5 2009 - 11:43pm)
  • uh?... By: martin dufresne (Apr 5 2009 - 11:36pm)
  • How prepostourous. Just when By: Feather Sky (Apr 5 2009 - 11:33pm)
  • Sorry if this was unclear By: martin dufresne (Apr 4 2009 - 5:19pm)
  • Are you saying Jessica Yee By: remind (Apr 4 2009 - 4:58pm)
  • Re: Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: martin dufresne (Apr 2 2009 - 8:55pm)
  • Re: Chatelaine attempts to restart "the abortion debate" By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 2 2009 - 7:14pm)
  • ""...Meanwhile, women on the By: remind (Apr 2 2009 - 4:53pm)
  • Yeah.  We'll never be done By: Michelle (Apr 2 2009 - 4:25pm)