Upcoming Federal by-elections By: West Coast Lefty (105 replies) April 25, 2009 - 1:48amottawaobserver wrote:
No, By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 2:55am) No, Debater, it's for health By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 1:11am) ottawaobserver wrote:
The By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 12:52am) I'm puzzled that CCMV is By: West Coast Lefty (Apr 28 2009 - 10:46pm) David Young wrote:Rodney By: Wilf Day (Apr 28 2009 - 9:40pm) ottawaobserver By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 9:03pm) No, not as leader. But By: Stephen Gordon (Apr 28 2009 - 9:02pm) "Then he (Dumont) could By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 8:38pm) Stockholm wrote:
Since there By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 7:55pm) It's not a bad question By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 7:53pm) David Young wrote:
Just By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 6:41pm) Just wondering!
If (when) By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 6:39pm) ottawaobserver By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 6:39pm) This appointment is a By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 6:33pm) Rodney suggested the By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 6:13pm) Interesting, will we be By: remind (Apr 28 2009 - 4:23pm) Re: Upcoming Federal by-elections By: robbie_dee (Apr 28 2009 - 4:00pm) Since there may be a lot of By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 3:10pm) I thought the riding was By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 2:24pm) If the NDP wins the NS By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 2:02pm) Its going to put EMay in a By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 1:37pm) Well- I heard it here.
This By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 1:34pm) Well i guess that settles By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 1:29pm) Looks like we can add Bill By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 1:17pm) Debater wrote:
...the By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 1:19pm) Considering debator that the By: janfromthebruce (Apr 28 2009 - 8:46am) Debater wrote:
The BQ will By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 8:07am) West Coast Lefty By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 1:51am) 2011 could be a big year for By: V. Jara (Apr 27 2009 - 7:17pm) I like Ménard a lot too, By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 9:25am) ottawaobserver By: West Coast Lefty (Apr 27 2009 - 2:10am) Meantime, it looks like By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 1:07am) There's some speculation at By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 12:27am) West Coast Lefty wrote:I By: Wilf Day (Apr 26 2009 - 10:16pm) I'm waiting to see if By: David Young (Apr 26 2009 - 9:00pm)
- Long thread - feel free to By: Michelle (May 22 2009 - 10:53am)
- Well speaking of By: Debater (May 22 2009 - 10:28am)
- "I engage in objective By: peterjcassidy (May 22 2009 - 12:57am)
- As I think I've said before, By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 11:49pm)
- And Ignatieff is tripping By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 11:32pm)
- Its hard to say - the fact By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 11:29pm)
- But didn't the second "work" By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 11:21pm)
- Let me put it this way. I By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 11:18pm)
- Stockholm wrote:Considering By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 11:09pm)
- I was reading that this guy By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 11:02pm)
- Also, Tory support in Quebec By: Stockholm (May 4 2009 - 11:50pm)
- The Liberal vote has indeed By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 11:28pm)
- Actually, Debater, given the By: ottawaobserver (May 4 2009 - 11:11pm)
- Of course there would be By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 10:55pm)
- I don't know how accurate By: David Young (May 4 2009 - 9:34pm)
- KenS wrote: Debater By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 8:32pm)
- For a sense of what Ms. By: Peter3 (May 4 2009 - 2:06pm)
- adma wrote: West Coast Lefty By: Scott Piatkowski (May 4 2009 - 10:22am)
- Debater wrote:Me, smug? By: KenS (May 4 2009 - 5:13am)
- Debater wrote:I was asking a By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 11:51pm)
- Debater wrote: And I was By: adma (May 3 2009 - 11:43pm)
- Me, smug? What about you By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 9:58pm)
- Your smugness is really By: KenS (May 3 2009 - 7:19pm)
- ottawaobserver By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 4:58pm)
- The extent to which By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 1:47pm)
- Debater By: ottawaobserver (May 3 2009 - 10:46am)
- Harper has also called By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 10:31am)
- I agree about Harper By: KenS (May 3 2009 - 1:49am)
- ottawaobserver wrote: You're By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 1:46am)
- KenS wrote: CCVM: By: West Coast Lefty (May 3 2009 - 1:21am)
- Stockholm wrote: 1. There is By: West Coast Lefty (May 3 2009 - 1:10am)
- I agree 100%. In the UK when By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 12:22am)
- Stockholm wrote: Keep in By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 12:07am)
- West Coast Lefty wrote: On By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 11:59pm)
- You're right, adma, but I By: ottawaobserver (May 2 2009 - 11:21pm)
- West Coast Lefty wrote:La By: adma (May 2 2009 - 11:16pm)
- 1. There is absolutely ZERO By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 9:33pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Keep in By: West Coast Lefty (May 2 2009 - 8:57pm)
- Keep in mind that there is a By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 8:34pm)
- What has been the practice By: Politics101 (May 2 2009 - 7:58pm)
- It should keep being brought By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 6:20pm)
- KenS wrote: Nope. Because By: Debater (May 2 2009 - 6:09pm)
- Nope. Because he'd be By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 5:37pm)
- Consider this when it comes By: David Young (May 2 2009 - 4:22pm)
- I hope she does run in CCMV. By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 10:14am)
- Some Greens (and me) By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 6:22am)
- It's silly to take your ball By: Debater (May 1 2009 - 1:57am)
- Well you have managed to By: KenS (Apr 30 2009 - 12:59pm)
- I am suspicious of anyone By: ottawaobserver (Apr 30 2009 - 12:41pm)
- Scott Piatkowski By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 11:28am)
- "I have tried to help by By: Stockholm (Apr 30 2009 - 11:18am)
- Debater wrote:Ken S, the By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 30 2009 - 10:10am)
- KenS wrote: Where do I get By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 10:03am)
- Debater, can we call you By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 30 2009 - 9:04am)
- Where do I get this feeling By: KenS (Apr 30 2009 - 5:15am)
- Stockholm wrote: "Nanos By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 12:21am)
- "Nanos research shows that By: Stockholm (Apr 30 2009 - 12:16am)
- KenS wrote: Shows how much By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 12:13am)
- Shows how much some people By: KenS (Apr 29 2009 - 8:18pm)
- KenS wrote: Let alone By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 7:16pm)
- Finally something we can By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 7:00pm)
- ottawaobserver By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 6:26pm)
- Let alone nothing is By: KenS (Apr 29 2009 - 4:29pm)
- Debater wrote: Well the BQ By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 3:50pm)
- Well the BQ is pretty much By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 3:41pm)
- If the BQ starts to fear By: Stockholm (Apr 29 2009 - 3:29pm)
- ottawaobserver wrote: The By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 3:24pm)
- Debater By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 8:58am)
- West Coast Lefty wrote: I'm By: adma (Apr 29 2009 - 8:31am)
- Debater wrote: If the Libs By: adma (Apr 29 2009 - 8:27am)
Meantime, it looks like Réal Ménard backed off the idea of running municipally, if I correctly understand the French idiom in this story from a few days later.
Thanks for those 2 updates, OO - Ménard is being very vague and ambigious in that article- saying he has nothing to announce "yet" and that he is still reflecting on how best to serve his constituents. It's the kind of thing you say when you know you are going to run but you want to keep your cushy MP job for a few more months without being criticized. I like Ménard a lot, though, and he's toyed with running provinicially before and then declined, so it's still up in the air. I know Rocheleau and the NDP organization in the riding are working to prepare for a possible by-election.
Dion will be gone by the end of the year, I predict. Either there will be an election this fall and he won't run again, or he'll resign his seat to accept a university post or international position as per the speculation in the article.
I predict May will not run in any of the by-elections. She is nowhere in Quebec, her French is shaky, and New West-Coquitlam is not a good fit for the Green message. She'll run in the next general election and then resign unless she wins a seat, which is less likely than ever, IMHO.