Upcoming Federal by-elections By: West Coast Lefty (105 replies) April 25, 2009 - 12:48amottawaobserver wrote:
No, By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 1:55am) No, Debater, it's for health By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 12:11am) ottawaobserver wrote:
The By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 11:52pm) I'm puzzled that CCMV is By: West Coast Lefty (Apr 28 2009 - 9:46pm) David Young wrote:Rodney By: Wilf Day (Apr 28 2009 - 8:40pm) ottawaobserver By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 8:03pm) No, not as leader. But By: Stephen Gordon (Apr 28 2009 - 8:02pm) "Then he (Dumont) could By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 7:38pm) Stockholm wrote:
Since there By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 6:55pm) It's not a bad question By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 6:53pm) David Young wrote:
Just By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 5:41pm) Just wondering!
If (when) By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 5:39pm) ottawaobserver By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 5:39pm) This appointment is a By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 5:33pm) Rodney suggested the By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 5:13pm) Interesting, will we be By: remind (Apr 28 2009 - 3:23pm) Re: Upcoming Federal by-elections By: robbie_dee (Apr 28 2009 - 3:00pm) Since there may be a lot of By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 2:10pm) I thought the riding was By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 1:24pm) If the NDP wins the NS By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 1:02pm) Its going to put EMay in a By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 12:37pm) Well- I heard it here.
This By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 12:34pm) Well i guess that settles By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 12:29pm) Looks like we can add Bill By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 12:17pm) Debater wrote:
...the By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 12:19pm) Considering debator that the By: janfromthebruce (Apr 28 2009 - 7:46am) Debater wrote:
The BQ will By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 7:07am) West Coast Lefty By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 12:51am) 2011 could be a big year for By: V. Jara (Apr 27 2009 - 6:17pm) I like Ménard a lot too, By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 8:25am) ottawaobserver By: West Coast Lefty (Apr 27 2009 - 1:10am) Meantime, it looks like By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 12:07am) There's some speculation at By: ottawaobserver (Apr 26 2009 - 11:27pm) West Coast Lefty wrote:I By: Wilf Day (Apr 26 2009 - 9:16pm) I'm waiting to see if By: David Young (Apr 26 2009 - 8:00pm)
- Long thread - feel free to By: Michelle (May 22 2009 - 9:53am)
- Well speaking of By: Debater (May 22 2009 - 9:28am)
- "I engage in objective By: peterjcassidy (May 21 2009 - 11:57pm)
- As I think I've said before, By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:49pm)
- And Ignatieff is tripping By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 10:32pm)
- Its hard to say - the fact By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:29pm)
- But didn't the second "work" By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 10:21pm)
- Let me put it this way. I By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:18pm)
- Stockholm wrote:Considering By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 10:09pm)
- I was reading that this guy By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:02pm)
- Also, Tory support in Quebec By: Stockholm (May 4 2009 - 10:50pm)
- The Liberal vote has indeed By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 10:28pm)
- Actually, Debater, given the By: ottawaobserver (May 4 2009 - 10:11pm)
- Of course there would be By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 9:55pm)
- I don't know how accurate By: David Young (May 4 2009 - 8:34pm)
- KenS wrote: Debater By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 7:32pm)
- For a sense of what Ms. By: Peter3 (May 4 2009 - 1:06pm)
- adma wrote: West Coast Lefty By: Scott Piatkowski (May 4 2009 - 9:22am)
- Debater wrote:Me, smug? By: KenS (May 4 2009 - 4:13am)
- Debater wrote:I was asking a By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 10:51pm)
- Debater wrote: And I was By: adma (May 3 2009 - 10:43pm)
- Me, smug? What about you By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 8:58pm)
- Your smugness is really By: KenS (May 3 2009 - 6:19pm)
- ottawaobserver By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 3:58pm)
- The extent to which By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 12:47pm)
- Debater By: ottawaobserver (May 3 2009 - 9:46am)
- Harper has also called By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 9:31am)
- I agree about Harper By: KenS (May 3 2009 - 12:49am)
- ottawaobserver wrote: You're By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 12:46am)
- KenS wrote: CCVM: By: West Coast Lefty (May 3 2009 - 12:21am)
- Stockholm wrote: 1. There is By: West Coast Lefty (May 3 2009 - 12:10am)
- I agree 100%. In the UK when By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 11:22pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Keep in By: Debater (May 2 2009 - 11:07pm)
- West Coast Lefty wrote: On By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 10:59pm)
- You're right, adma, but I By: ottawaobserver (May 2 2009 - 10:21pm)
- West Coast Lefty wrote:La By: adma (May 2 2009 - 10:16pm)
- 1. There is absolutely ZERO By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 8:33pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Keep in By: West Coast Lefty (May 2 2009 - 7:57pm)
- Keep in mind that there is a By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 7:34pm)
- What has been the practice By: Politics101 (May 2 2009 - 6:58pm)
- It should keep being brought By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 5:20pm)
- KenS wrote: Nope. Because By: Debater (May 2 2009 - 5:09pm)
- Nope. Because he'd be By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 4:37pm)
- Consider this when it comes By: David Young (May 2 2009 - 3:22pm)
- I hope she does run in CCMV. By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 9:14am)
- Some Greens (and me) By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 5:22am)
- It's silly to take your ball By: Debater (May 1 2009 - 12:57am)
- Well you have managed to By: KenS (Apr 30 2009 - 11:59am)
- I am suspicious of anyone By: ottawaobserver (Apr 30 2009 - 11:41am)
- Scott Piatkowski By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 10:28am)
- "I have tried to help by By: Stockholm (Apr 30 2009 - 10:18am)
- Debater wrote:Ken S, the By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 30 2009 - 9:10am)
- KenS wrote: Where do I get By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 9:03am)
- Debater, can we call you By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 30 2009 - 8:04am)
- Where do I get this feeling By: KenS (Apr 30 2009 - 4:15am)
- Stockholm wrote: "Nanos By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 11:21pm)
- "Nanos research shows that By: Stockholm (Apr 29 2009 - 11:16pm)
- KenS wrote: Shows how much By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 11:13pm)
- Shows how much some people By: KenS (Apr 29 2009 - 7:18pm)
- KenS wrote: Let alone By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 6:16pm)
- Finally something we can By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 6:00pm)
- ottawaobserver By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 5:26pm)
- Let alone nothing is By: KenS (Apr 29 2009 - 3:29pm)
- Debater wrote: Well the BQ By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 2:50pm)
- Well the BQ is pretty much By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 2:41pm)
- If the BQ starts to fear By: Stockholm (Apr 29 2009 - 2:29pm)
- ottawaobserver wrote: The By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 2:24pm)
- Debater By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 7:58am)
- West Coast Lefty wrote: I'm By: adma (Apr 29 2009 - 7:31am)
- Debater wrote: If the Libs By: adma (Apr 29 2009 - 7:27am)
The BQ will probably hold the seat, but the Liberals have an outside shot at it as they are on the rise in Quebec, including in Francophone Quebec.
The Liberals held the Montmagny-l'Islet side in 1997 and 2000, but the redistributed seat put them back quite a bit in the 2000 Transposition, and they placed third there in the last two elections. I know you folks are in the middle of a new Leader rosy glow right now, but even "outside shot" is a bit of a stretch here, unless you can recruit some kind of superstar candidate.