Upcoming Federal by-elections By: West Coast Lefty (105 replies) April 25, 2009 - 12:48amottawaobserver wrote:
No, By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 1:55am) No, Debater, it's for health By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 12:11am) ottawaobserver wrote:
The By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 11:52pm) I'm puzzled that CCMV is By: West Coast Lefty (Apr 28 2009 - 9:46pm) David Young wrote:Rodney By: Wilf Day (Apr 28 2009 - 8:40pm) ottawaobserver By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 8:03pm) No, not as leader. But By: Stephen Gordon (Apr 28 2009 - 8:02pm) "Then he (Dumont) could By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 7:38pm) Stockholm wrote:
Since there By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 6:55pm) It's not a bad question By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 6:53pm) David Young wrote:
Just By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 5:41pm) Just wondering!
If (when) By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 5:39pm) ottawaobserver By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 5:39pm) This appointment is a By: David Young (Apr 28 2009 - 5:33pm) Rodney suggested the By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 5:13pm) Interesting, will we be By: remind (Apr 28 2009 - 3:23pm) Re: Upcoming Federal by-elections By: robbie_dee (Apr 28 2009 - 3:00pm) Since there may be a lot of By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 2:10pm) I thought the riding was By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 1:24pm) If the NDP wins the NS By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 1:02pm) Its going to put EMay in a By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 12:37pm) Well- I heard it here.
This By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 12:34pm) Well i guess that settles By: Stockholm (Apr 28 2009 - 12:29pm) Looks like we can add Bill By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 12:17pm) Debater wrote:
...the By: KenS (Apr 28 2009 - 12:19pm) Considering debator that the By: janfromthebruce (Apr 28 2009 - 7:46am) Debater wrote:
The BQ will By: ottawaobserver (Apr 28 2009 - 7:07am) West Coast Lefty By: Debater (Apr 28 2009 - 12:51am) 2011 could be a big year for By: V. Jara (Apr 27 2009 - 6:17pm) I like Ménard a lot too, By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 8:25am) ottawaobserver By: West Coast Lefty (Apr 27 2009 - 1:10am) Meantime, it looks like By: ottawaobserver (Apr 27 2009 - 12:07am) There's some speculation at By: ottawaobserver (Apr 26 2009 - 11:27pm) West Coast Lefty wrote:I By: Wilf Day (Apr 26 2009 - 9:16pm) I'm waiting to see if By: David Young (Apr 26 2009 - 8:00pm)
- Long thread - feel free to By: Michelle (May 22 2009 - 9:53am)
- Well speaking of By: Debater (May 22 2009 - 9:28am)
- "I engage in objective By: peterjcassidy (May 21 2009 - 11:57pm)
- As I think I've said before, By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:49pm)
- And Ignatieff is tripping By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 10:32pm)
- Its hard to say - the fact By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:29pm)
- But didn't the second "work" By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 10:21pm)
- Let me put it this way. I By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:18pm)
- Stockholm wrote:Considering By: Lord Palmerston (May 21 2009 - 10:09pm)
- I was reading that this guy By: Stockholm (May 21 2009 - 10:02pm)
- Also, Tory support in Quebec By: Stockholm (May 4 2009 - 10:50pm)
- The Liberal vote has indeed By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 10:28pm)
- Actually, Debater, given the By: ottawaobserver (May 4 2009 - 10:11pm)
- Of course there would be By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 9:55pm)
- I don't know how accurate By: David Young (May 4 2009 - 8:34pm)
- KenS wrote: Debater By: Debater (May 4 2009 - 7:32pm)
- For a sense of what Ms. By: Peter3 (May 4 2009 - 1:06pm)
- adma wrote: West Coast Lefty By: Scott Piatkowski (May 4 2009 - 9:22am)
- Debater wrote:Me, smug? By: KenS (May 4 2009 - 4:13am)
- Debater wrote:I was asking a By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 10:51pm)
- Debater wrote: And I was By: adma (May 3 2009 - 10:43pm)
- Me, smug? What about you By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 8:58pm)
- Your smugness is really By: KenS (May 3 2009 - 6:19pm)
- ottawaobserver By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 3:58pm)
- The extent to which By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 12:47pm)
- Debater By: ottawaobserver (May 3 2009 - 9:46am)
- Harper has also called By: Stockholm (May 3 2009 - 9:31am)
- I agree about Harper By: KenS (May 3 2009 - 12:49am)
- ottawaobserver wrote: You're By: Debater (May 3 2009 - 12:46am)
- KenS wrote: CCVM: By: West Coast Lefty (May 3 2009 - 12:21am)
- Stockholm wrote: 1. There is By: West Coast Lefty (May 3 2009 - 12:10am)
- I agree 100%. In the UK when By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 11:22pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Keep in By: Debater (May 2 2009 - 11:07pm)
- West Coast Lefty wrote: On By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 10:59pm)
- You're right, adma, but I By: ottawaobserver (May 2 2009 - 10:21pm)
- West Coast Lefty wrote:La By: adma (May 2 2009 - 10:16pm)
- 1. There is absolutely ZERO By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 8:33pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Keep in By: West Coast Lefty (May 2 2009 - 7:57pm)
- Keep in mind that there is a By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 7:34pm)
- What has been the practice By: Politics101 (May 2 2009 - 6:58pm)
- It should keep being brought By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 5:20pm)
- KenS wrote: Nope. Because By: Debater (May 2 2009 - 5:09pm)
- Nope. Because he'd be By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 4:37pm)
- Consider this when it comes By: David Young (May 2 2009 - 3:22pm)
- I hope she does run in CCMV. By: Stockholm (May 2 2009 - 9:14am)
- Some Greens (and me) By: KenS (May 2 2009 - 5:22am)
- It's silly to take your ball By: Debater (May 1 2009 - 12:57am)
- Well you have managed to By: KenS (Apr 30 2009 - 11:59am)
- I am suspicious of anyone By: ottawaobserver (Apr 30 2009 - 11:41am)
- Scott Piatkowski By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 10:28am)
- "I have tried to help by By: Stockholm (Apr 30 2009 - 10:18am)
- Debater wrote:Ken S, the By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 30 2009 - 9:10am)
- KenS wrote: Where do I get By: Debater (Apr 30 2009 - 9:03am)
- Debater, can we call you By: Scott Piatkowski (Apr 30 2009 - 8:04am)
- Where do I get this feeling By: KenS (Apr 30 2009 - 4:15am)
- Stockholm wrote: "Nanos By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 11:21pm)
- "Nanos research shows that By: Stockholm (Apr 29 2009 - 11:16pm)
- KenS wrote: Shows how much By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 11:13pm)
- Shows how much some people By: KenS (Apr 29 2009 - 7:18pm)
- KenS wrote: Let alone By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 6:16pm)
- Finally something we can By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 6:00pm)
- ottawaobserver By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 5:26pm)
- Let alone nothing is By: KenS (Apr 29 2009 - 3:29pm)
- Debater wrote: Well the BQ By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 2:50pm)
- Well the BQ is pretty much By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 2:41pm)
- If the BQ starts to fear By: Stockholm (Apr 29 2009 - 2:29pm)
- ottawaobserver wrote: The By: Debater (Apr 29 2009 - 2:24pm)
- Debater By: ottawaobserver (Apr 29 2009 - 7:58am)
- West Coast Lefty wrote: I'm By: adma (Apr 29 2009 - 7:31am)
- Debater wrote: If the Libs By: adma (Apr 29 2009 - 7:27am)
Considering debator that the liberals are corinating the most "regressive supposed progressive" lib leader, outside shot is way off the mark.