Skinny Dipper
rabble-rouser
Member: 12459
Joined: Dec 23 2005

About a week ago, I went to the www.trystv.ca website.  Even though a random sample of people have not taken the STV style poll on the BC election, I counted the number of men and women that would be elected.  At that time, I determined that about 31% of the winning candidates would be women.  In the BC legislative assembly at dissolution, about 22 percent of the MLAs were women.  I do think that if BC-STV achieves the 60% hurdle, in the first couple of elections at least 30% of the winning candidates will be women.

On to Bill Tieleman and David Schreck, two BC NDP honchos:

If I were living in BC, I would not be voting for the NDP this time.  I'd rather vote for the Greens or BC Liberals.  In theory, Tieleman and Shreck are running the First Past the Post campaign independently of the NDP organization.  Unfortunately, the party leadership has not taken sides in the referendum debate.  If the BC-STV fails to reach the 60 percent threshold and if the NDP forms a majority government, I can see Messrs Tieleman and Schreck being invited to work with Carole James.

I have always thought that the NDP represented average Canadians.  With Tieleman and Schreck campaigning for First Past the Post, and with the BC NDP not taking a stand in favour of BC STV, I know that the NDP want to represent their own elite interests.

First Past the Post is for the party honchos;

BC-STV is for the people of British Columbia.


STV is not good for Bill Tieleman By: ReeferMadness (87 replies) May 2, 2009 - 12:44am
  • remind wrote:Scotland has By: Wilf Day (May 4 2009 - 11:02pm)
  • How much money did the By: Fidel (May 4 2009 - 6:31pm)
  • Quote:I've given the matter By: melovesproles (May 4 2009 - 6:26pm)
  • I have mentioned on one of By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 6:03pm)
  • remind wrote: Wilf, sorry, By: Policywonk (May 4 2009 - 5:52pm)
  • So those Irish stats show By: remind (May 4 2009 - 5:04pm)
  • Thanks Vorshlumpf for the By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 4:46pm)
  • Here is a page that has some By: vorshlumpf (May 4 2009 - 3:57pm)
  • I don't know if women were By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 11:43am)
  • Wilf, sorry, but your By: remind (May 4 2009 - 10:13am)
  • Wilf Day wrote:You would By: Catchfire (May 4 2009 - 7:30am)
  • Throughout the referendum By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 6:42am)
  • Well Niilo, in fairness, By: ReeferMadness (May 4 2009 - 12:08am)
  • I have yet to hear an By: vorshlumpf (May 3 2009 - 10:44pm)
  • ReeferMadness wrote:I recall By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 10:36pm)
  • Correct me if I'm wrong, By: ReeferMadness (May 3 2009 - 9:25pm)
  • remind wrote:1. Like I said By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 8:42pm)
  • Wilf:  1. Like I said By: remind (May 3 2009 - 7:58pm)
  • Wilf Day wrote: The weird By: ReeferMadness (May 3 2009 - 7:02pm)
  • remind wrote:Thanks left By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 4:21pm)
  • Thanks left turn, and am  By: remind (May 3 2009 - 4:06pm)
  • The weird thing about this By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 4:20pm)
  • remind wrote: And why would By: Left Turn (May 3 2009 - 3:32pm)
  • And why would some votes By: remind (May 3 2009 - 2:55pm)
  • Tieleman writes that STV By: Baron Visi (May 3 2009 - 2:12pm)
  • Oh yes, let's vote for BC By: remind (May 3 2009 - 10:30am)
  • Skinny Dipper wrote:With By: Wilf Day (May 2 2009 - 8:30pm)
  • ReeferMadness wrote: Skinny By: Skinny Dipper (May 2 2009 - 6:19pm)
  • ReeferMadness, please check By: Naci_Sey (May 2 2009 - 4:55pm)
  • Skinny Dipper wrote: First By: ReeferMadness (May 2 2009 - 4:22pm)
  • About a week ago, I went to By: Skinny Dipper (May 2 2009 - 3:50pm)
  • ReeferMadness wrote:Bill By: Wilf Day (May 2 2009 - 12:10pm)
  • I've given the matter some By: ReeferMadness (May 2 2009 - 3:05am)
  • It's not as though Tieleman By: Wilf Day (May 2 2009 - 2:19am)
  • I know what you mean. By: Jacob Two-Two (May 2 2009 - 1:28am)