Galloway sues Jason Kenney, Bernie Farber, Frank Dimant for libel By: Unionist (104 replies) May 1, 2009 - 11:03pmCueball, you are really By: Jaku (May 3 2009 - 10:26pm) Winnifred wrote:
"What part By: Cueball (May 3 2009 - 9:24pm) A couple of thoughts.
First, By: Jaku (May 3 2009 - 7:07pm) Slumberjack wrote:
What By: Unionist (May 3 2009 - 1:17pm) What would his By: Slumberjack (May 3 2009 - 1:02pm) Winnifred wrote:
I By: Unionist (May 3 2009 - 12:53pm) I understand you better now By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 12:49pm) The two fundamental By: Unionist (May 3 2009 - 12:43pm) In a nutshell Maysie, By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 12:47pm) Diogenes, don't get me By: Maysie (May 3 2009 - 12:34pm) Not being a lawyer I don't By: Maysie (May 3 2009 - 12:34pm) Maysie wrote:
And, "I saw it By: Diogenes (May 3 2009 - 12:28pm) I'm not sure why you have By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 12:24pm) Sadly, given Canada's By: Maysie (May 3 2009 - 12:14pm) Oh so because our Terra By: thorin_bane (May 3 2009 - 12:08pm) "What part of they are the By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 11:56am) Pretty obvious, IMV, as it By: remind (May 3 2009 - 11:51am) Winnifred supports Israel. By: Unionist (May 3 2009 - 11:34am) Winnifred I fail to By: Maysie (May 3 2009 - 11:29am) So you are saying that the By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 11:10am) Winnifred wrote:
There is By: Diogenes (May 3 2009 - 10:25am) Unionist wrote:
You should By: Diogenes (May 3 2009 - 10:26am) reconsidered.
By: Lard Tunderin Jeezus (May 3 2009 - 10:11am) And what exactly would he By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 8:59am) You should state your name By: Unionist (May 3 2009 - 8:46am) I read a few stories and By: Winnifred (May 3 2009 - 8:33am) Yay George! I think he's By: Boom Boom (May 3 2009 - 5:19am) hopefully both By: thorin_bane (May 3 2009 - 2:14am) Good for him, but is he By: remind (May 2 2009 - 2:40pm) (No subject) By: thanks (May 2 2009 - 10:05am) Seemed to me that was By: Cueball (May 2 2009 - 12:58am) glad you're awake Cueball. By: thanks (May 1 2009 - 11:56pm) Yes, I saw that. By: Cueball (May 1 2009 - 11:29pm) at least cbc said Hamas was By: thanks (May 1 2009 - 11:26pm) I am not sure why he didn't By: Cueball (May 1 2009 - 11:24pm)
- Long thread. By: Michelle (May 7 2009 - 7:33am)
- Quote:If what you say is By: al-Qa'bong (May 6 2009 - 6:56pm)
- contrarianna wrote: Jaku By: Winnifred (May 6 2009 - 4:18pm)
- I have come to the By: Cueball (May 6 2009 - 4:24pm)
- Snert wrote: Didn't Galloway By: Diogenes (May 6 2009 - 2:57pm)
- Jaku wrote: You sue people By: contrarianna (May 6 2009 - 12:23pm)
- Jaku wrote: al-Qa'bong By: Lard Tunderin Jeezus (May 6 2009 - 9:10am)
- Diogenes wrote: Jaku By: Jaku (May 6 2009 - 7:17am)
- al-Qa'bong wrote: (I By: Jaku (May 6 2009 - 7:13am)
- Jaku wrote: And curiously By: Diogenes (May 6 2009 - 6:33am)
- Winnifred wrote: From By: al-Qa'bong (May 5 2009 - 11:17pm)
- And curiously why is By: Jaku (May 5 2009 - 3:29pm)
- Britain has just released a By: Joel_Goldenberg (May 5 2009 - 2:55pm)
- Wasn't Galloway also By: Joel_Goldenberg (May 5 2009 - 2:31pm)
- I have read accounts that By: Jaku (May 4 2009 - 8:39pm)
- Winnifred they put a paid By: remind (May 4 2009 - 8:07pm)
- Actually, that is slighly of By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:55pm)
- Winnifred has never posted By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 6:49pm)
- Tony Blair recently had By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:50pm)
- remind wrote: winnifred, By: Winnifred (May 4 2009 - 6:39pm)
- Well, he doubtless thought By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:37pm)
- Cueball wrote: Slumberjack By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 6:36pm)
- remind wrote: Perhap By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:28pm)
- Slumberjack wrote: Cueball By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:27pm)
- Perhap Canadians should By: remind (May 4 2009 - 6:26pm)
- Cueball bought it up. By: Slumberjack (May 4 2009 - 6:25pm)
- Re: Galloway sues Jason Kenney, Bernie Farber, Frank Dimant for By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 6:24pm)
- Sounds like a good start to By: Slumberjack (May 4 2009 - 6:24pm)
- It is a ridiculous By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:25pm)
- Cueball wrote: The By: Slumberjack (May 4 2009 - 6:16pm)
- Talk about parse the By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:12pm)
- No he is suing them for libel By: remind (May 4 2009 - 6:08pm)
- You don't get it. Rub your By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:08pm)
- Yes I do. So where are you By: oldgoat (May 4 2009 - 5:59pm)
- Well, that at least is By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 6:00pm)
- Why is it about immigration? By: remind (May 4 2009 - 5:55pm)
- Well frankly, given that no By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 5:51pm)
- winnifred, what I read in By: remind (May 4 2009 - 5:43pm)
- Quote: Anyway, can the By: oldgoat (May 4 2009 - 5:41pm)
- This is also off topic. The By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 5:00pm)
- Remind have you at least By: Winnifred (May 4 2009 - 4:49pm)
- Star Spangled Canadian By: Cueball (May 4 2009 - 4:48pm)
- I do not revere him, By: remind (May 4 2009 - 4:33pm)
- Winnifred wrote: Mr. Levant By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 3:50pm)
- But Remind, Historian By: Winnifred (May 4 2009 - 3:49pm)
- I agree and it started long By: remind (May 4 2009 - 3:18pm)
- Fascinating, the reluctance By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 3:07pm)
- Winnifred wrote:Remind, talk By: remind (May 4 2009 - 6:49pm)
- Star Spangled Canadian By: Joel_Goldenberg (May 4 2009 - 2:42pm)
- Unionist wrote: No, that's By: Star Spangled Canadian (May 4 2009 - 2:14pm)
- Practise this in front of a By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 1:59pm)
- Unionist wrote: Winnifred By: Winnifred (May 4 2009 - 1:57pm)
- No, that's not essentially By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 1:53pm)
- Unionist wrote: Ahenakew has By: Star Spangled Canadian (May 4 2009 - 1:48pm)
- Winnifred wrote: Unionist By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 1:41pm)
- Unionist wrote: Jaku By: Winnifred (May 4 2009 - 1:30pm)
- It seems to me the serious By: remind (May 4 2009 - 8:28pm)
- Ahenakew has warped and By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 10:43am)
- Unionist wrote: Excuse me, By: Star Spangled Canadian (May 4 2009 - 10:22am)
- Quote:Excuse me, Snert and By: Snert (May 4 2009 - 10:01am)
- Excuse me, Snert and SSC, I By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 9:42am)
- Unionist wrote: Galloway is By: Star Spangled Canadian (May 4 2009 - 9:10am)
- Quote:There is a difference By: Snert (May 4 2009 - 9:05am)
- Jaku wrote: Well in fact no By: Unionist (May 4 2009 - 7:49am)
- "This is indeed the By: Jaku (May 4 2009 - 7:36am)
- Libel. Yes. Outright By: Cueball (May 3 2009 - 11:09pm)
- Funny kind of looks like By: N.R.KISSED (May 4 2009 - 4:31pm)
- Jaku wrote: For a guy who so By: Unionist (May 3 2009 - 10:40pm)
- Who said anything about the By: Cueball (May 3 2009 - 10:37pm)
I read a few stories and googled "Galloway, terrorism", this will be a tough case for Galloway to proceed with.
From what I have seen and despite Mr. Galloway's best intentions he has made common cause with Hamas branded by Canadian law as a terrorist group. There is one clip I saw on youtube of Mr. Galloway giving stacks of cash to Hamas leaders then daring any government to charge him. From that point on people can make "fair comment" on his connections to terrorism.
In fact in a recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada defamation defences have become much more accepted, especially those on fair comment http://www2.canada.com/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=c5e9c58e-33ae-47e...