Left Turn
rabble-rouser
Member: 9662
Joined: Mar 28 2005

remind wrote:

And why would some votes stay intact while others fractionalize?

When a candidate gets more votes than required to get elected, the excess votes transfer to the voters next preferences. However, to ensure that every vote for said candidate is treated equally, what transfers is a fraction of each vote, so we don't get a situation where some votes transfer (ie. count twice), and some votes don't (also would be impossible to fairly determine which votes would transfer, and which would not). So if say Jenny Kwan gets 10% more votes on the first ballot than the number required to win, 10% of every first place vote for Jenny Kwan transfers to the voters next preference (rather than having 10% of votes transfer in their entirety, and 90% not transfer at all).


STV is not good for Bill Tieleman By: ReeferMadness (87 replies) May 2, 2009 - 1:44am
  • remind wrote:Scotland has By: Wilf Day (May 5 2009 - 12:02am)
  • How much money did the By: Fidel (May 4 2009 - 7:31pm)
  • Quote:I've given the matter By: melovesproles (May 4 2009 - 7:26pm)
  • I have mentioned on one of By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 7:03pm)
  • remind wrote: Wilf, sorry, By: Policywonk (May 4 2009 - 6:52pm)
  • So those Irish stats show By: remind (May 4 2009 - 6:04pm)
  • Thanks Vorshlumpf for the By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 5:46pm)
  • Here is a page that has some By: vorshlumpf (May 4 2009 - 4:57pm)
  • I don't know if women were By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 12:43pm)
  • Wilf, sorry, but your By: remind (May 4 2009 - 11:13am)
  • Wilf Day wrote:You would By: Catchfire (May 4 2009 - 8:30am)
  • Throughout the referendum By: Skinny Dipper (May 4 2009 - 7:42am)
  • Well Niilo, in fairness, By: ReeferMadness (May 4 2009 - 1:08am)
  • I have yet to hear an By: vorshlumpf (May 3 2009 - 11:44pm)
  • ReeferMadness wrote:I recall By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 11:36pm)
  • Correct me if I'm wrong, By: ReeferMadness (May 3 2009 - 10:25pm)
  • remind wrote:1. Like I said By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 9:42pm)
  • Wilf:  1. Like I said By: remind (May 3 2009 - 8:58pm)
  • Wilf Day wrote: The weird By: ReeferMadness (May 3 2009 - 8:02pm)
  • remind wrote:Thanks left By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 5:21pm)
  • Thanks left turn, and am  By: remind (May 3 2009 - 5:06pm)
  • The weird thing about this By: Wilf Day (May 3 2009 - 5:20pm)
  • remind wrote: And why would By: Left Turn (May 3 2009 - 4:32pm)
  • And why would some votes By: remind (May 3 2009 - 3:55pm)
  • Tieleman writes that STV By: Baron Visi (May 3 2009 - 3:12pm)
  • Oh yes, let's vote for BC By: remind (May 3 2009 - 11:30am)
  • Skinny Dipper wrote:With By: Wilf Day (May 2 2009 - 9:30pm)
  • ReeferMadness wrote: Skinny By: Skinny Dipper (May 2 2009 - 7:19pm)
  • ReeferMadness, please check By: Naci_Sey (May 2 2009 - 5:55pm)
  • Skinny Dipper wrote: First By: ReeferMadness (May 2 2009 - 5:22pm)
  • About a week ago, I went to By: Skinny Dipper (May 2 2009 - 4:50pm)
  • ReeferMadness wrote:Bill By: Wilf Day (May 2 2009 - 1:10pm)
  • I've given the matter some By: ReeferMadness (May 2 2009 - 4:05am)
  • It's not as though Tieleman By: Wilf Day (May 2 2009 - 3:19am)
  • I know what you mean. By: Jacob Two-Two (May 2 2009 - 2:28am)