Who's calling the shots for the Liberals By: NorthReport (49 replies) June 17, 2009 - 6:17pmIn many ways, the best By: Stockholm (Jun 29 2009 - 10:27am) ottawaobserver wrote:
I By: KenS (Jun 28 2009 - 6:59am) NorthReport By: Debater (Jun 28 2009 - 12:57am) By the way, I just read the By: ottawaobserver (Jun 27 2009 - 10:09pm) Precisely.
The Liberals will By: NorthReport (Jun 27 2009 - 9:34pm) NorthReport wrote:
Ignatieff By: Debater (Jun 27 2009 - 9:04pm) I don't think Ignatieff By: ottawaobserver (Jun 27 2009 - 7:45pm) Ignatieff blinked, and By: NorthReport (Jun 27 2009 - 7:27pm) NorthReport wrote:
Whoever By: Debater (Jun 27 2009 - 7:03pm) Whoever is calling shots for By: NorthReport (Jun 27 2009 - 6:45pm) Ignatieff Liberals By: NorthReport (Jun 25 2009 - 12:53am) Exactly, his "denial" By: Scott Piatkowski (Jun 24 2009 - 10:09pm) There would be nothing By: Bookish Agrarian (Jun 24 2009 - 10:01pm) Former Chief Economist of By: ottawaobserver (Jun 24 2009 - 9:31pm) McCallum is an ex-Royal By: NorthReport (Jun 24 2009 - 8:03pm) They needed to only have By: remind (Jun 23 2009 - 3:54pm) If by 'how much to finance By: KenS (Jun 23 2009 - 3:33pm) It's not the corporate By: ottawaobserver (Jun 23 2009 - 2:51pm) Pshaw.
Raitt on By: KenS (Jun 23 2009 - 1:36am) You're right, DV, I hadn't By: ottawaobserver (Jun 22 2009 - 10:55pm) Bookish said,
"Interestingly By: D V (Jun 22 2009 - 1:57pm) It's still only one day's By: ottawaobserver (Jun 19 2009 - 11:41am) Not a word was mentioned of By: remind (Jun 19 2009 - 9:26am) Deja vu. By: KenS (Jun 18 2009 - 9:45pm) Well, the Liberals haven't By: West Coast Greeny (Jun 18 2009 - 8:25pm) Interestingly I posted By: Bookish Agrarian (Jun 18 2009 - 4:28pm) The more the Liberals deal By: Uncle John (Jun 18 2009 - 4:12pm) West Coast Greeny wrote: He By: Fidel (Jun 18 2009 - 4:08pm) West Coast Greeny wrote:He By: KenS (Jun 18 2009 - 4:04pm) IT's only hersey in it By: thorin_bane (Jun 18 2009 - 3:34pm) Ouch. Although it is By: West Coast Greeny (Jun 17 2009 - 11:16pm) LOL By: ennir (Jun 17 2009 - 11:01pm) ennir wrote:
So who decided By: RosaL (Jun 17 2009 - 10:57pm) So who decided to run with By: ennir (Jun 17 2009 - 10:49pm) Quote:Certainly the bankers By: Fidel (Jun 17 2009 - 10:42pm)
- That author's thesis was By: ottawaobserver (Jun 30 2009 - 11:48am)
- Regardless of who gets the By: NorthReport (Jun 30 2009 - 11:15am)
- KenS wrote: While anything By: Debater (Jun 30 2009 - 12:50am)
- If Lib+NDP seats are over By: KenS (Jun 29 2009 - 10:43pm)
- Stockholm wrote: That By: adma (Jun 29 2009 - 10:24pm)
- D V wrote: (Can someone tell By: ottawaobserver (Jun 29 2009 - 4:36pm)
- Although come to think of By: ottawaobserver (Jun 29 2009 - 4:39pm)
- Here ottawa' is observing By: D V (Jun 29 2009 - 4:28pm)
- I suppose, but Harper needs By: ottawaobserver (Jun 29 2009 - 4:27pm)
- So Harper's number one issue By: NorthReport (Jun 29 2009 - 4:20pm)
- Or else I suppose it could By: ottawaobserver (Jun 29 2009 - 3:33pm)
- That suggests that the only By: Stockholm (Jun 29 2009 - 11:09am)
- NorthReport wrote: Yes, By: NorthReport (Jun 29 2009 - 10:55am)
- Yes, there is a good By: NorthReport (Jun 29 2009 - 10:41am)
Whoever is calling shots for the Liberals they made a huge mistake not forcing an election this spring as this article clearly points out. Those attack ads are paying off inspite of the BS in the Toronto Star, and Ignatieff's popularity is tanking. it was only a matter of time anyways. Bring on Trudeau next, as Ignatieff is toast.
Harper's next big chance
With Ignatieff cowed, the PM's brain trust plans the next attack
http://www2.macleans.ca/2009/06/27/harper%E2%80%99s-next-big-chance/