Schism in Toronto CUPE strike: Summer workers start petition to get legislated back to work By: Sineed (80 replies) July 3, 2009 - 6:14pmRe: Schism in Toronto CUPE strike: Summer workers start petition By: Doug (Jul 9 2009 - 3:06pm) Hmmm... picketers demanding By: Unionist (Jul 8 2009 - 11:45pm) Supposedly they are the By: Stargazer (Jul 8 2009 - 6:05pm) Well why wouldn't they be By: remind (Jul 8 2009 - 6:00pm) Never thought of that but By: Stargazer (Jul 8 2009 - 5:55pm) Maybe they are getting paid By: remind (Jul 8 2009 - 5:17pm) Saw some of those students By: Stargazer (Jul 8 2009 - 5:14pm) Re: Schism in Toronto CUPE strike: Summer workers start petition By: Unionist (Jul 8 2009 - 4:54pm) Yup. It's either show up By: Michelle (Jul 8 2009 - 3:20pm) Don't you have to do picket By: M. Spector (Jul 8 2009 - 3:17pm) Thanks for posting that, By: Michelle (Jul 8 2009 - 3:15pm) cmkl wrote:
CUPE strike pay By: Lard Tunderin Jeezus (Jul 8 2009 - 3:11pm) CUPE strike pay is $200 per By: cmkl (Jul 8 2009 - 3:04pm) meanwhile Miller says "it is By: remind (Jul 8 2009 - 9:54am) His first By: Unionist (Jul 4 2009 - 11:04pm) Thank you old goat for By: remind (Jul 4 2009 - 6:47pm) Self_important_ass. I'm By: oldgoat (Jul 4 2009 - 6:37pm) N.Beltov wrote:
Well, it's By: Unionist (Jul 4 2009 - 5:12pm) N.Beltov, the Facebook group By: Self_important_ass (Jul 5 2009 - 2:18pm) Hey Brendan,
While I agree By: city_worker (Jul 4 2009 - 4:57pm) Well, it's true that By: N.Beltov (Jul 4 2009 - 4:21pm) Hi, I'm the self-interested By: Self_important_ass (Jul 4 2009 - 4:14pm) If the self-important ass By: Unionist (Jul 4 2009 - 8:38am) I find this the most By: spatrioter (Jul 4 2009 - 8:19am) I certainly empathize with By: Doug (Jul 4 2009 - 2:22am) *hands clapping* By: remind (Jul 3 2009 - 10:15pm) Sineed wrote:
Dude - By: Unionist (Jul 3 2009 - 8:26pm)
I can actually sympathize By: Tommy_Paine (Jul 3 2009 - 8:17pm) Unionist wrote:
Maybe the By: Sineed (Jul 3 2009 - 7:56pm) It's been a horrible day of By: Stargazer (Jul 3 2009 - 7:40pm) Maybe the 17-year-old should By: Unionist (Jul 3 2009 - 7:31pm) Not to mention that summer By: Cueball (Jul 3 2009 - 7:19pm) That "scum" is probably some By: Michelle (Jul 3 2009 - 7:13pm) Whichever scum started this By: Unionist (Jul 3 2009 - 6:49pm) Whoops, I forgot to add the By: Sineed (Jul 3 2009 - 6:22pm)
- nussy wrote: I took my By: Doug (Jul 17 2009 - 5:35pm)
- My Cat Knows Better By: RANGER (Jul 15 2009 - 9:38pm)
- I took my morning walk and I By: nussy (Jul 15 2009 - 10:42am)
- thanks writer...got stuck By: johnpauljones (Jul 15 2009 - 10:28am)
- I'm Tamie, 16 and on strike By: writer (Jul 15 2009 - 10:28am)
- also their was an amazing By: johnpauljones (Jul 15 2009 - 10:01am)
- Great column as usual by By: Unionist (Jul 15 2009 - 8:00am)
- Enough trash talk about By: writer (Jul 15 2009 - 10:20am)
- Mick wrote: What would the By: My Cat Knows Better (Jul 12 2009 - 10:35pm)
- Ghislaine wrote: I have been By: Unionist (Jul 12 2009 - 10:27pm)
- I'm no fan of back to work By: Mick (Jul 12 2009 - 10:04pm)
- I'm sure the people who By: My Cat Knows Better (Jul 12 2009 - 9:50pm)
- Here is the link for By: remind (Jul 12 2009 - 11:01am)
- Ghislaine, there's a big By: Michelle (Jul 12 2009 - 11:01am)
- Unionist wrote: Ghislaine By: Ghislaine (Jul 12 2009 - 10:31am)
- Ghislaine wrote: If union By: Unionist (Jul 12 2009 - 10:23am)
- A_J wrote: Toronto Star By: Ghislaine (Jul 12 2009 - 10:18am)
- More lazy reporting from The By: 1weasel (Jul 12 2009 - 10:03am)
- . By: 1weasel (Jul 12 2009 - 10:01am)
- Unionist wrote: Sorry to By: Refuge (Jul 12 2009 - 9:50am)
- They should do neural By: remind (Jul 11 2009 - 11:01pm)
- Toronto Star wrote:On By: A_J (Jul 11 2009 - 10:47pm)
- Skinny Dipper wrote: If By: Unionist (Jul 11 2009 - 9:30pm)
- I just read the petition at By: Skinny Dipper (Jul 11 2009 - 9:07pm)
- Refuge wrote: Even keel By: Unionist (Jul 11 2009 - 8:42pm)
- People are fuming at Mayor By: Stargazer (Jul 11 2009 - 8:31pm)
- dp By: Refuge (Jul 11 2009 - 8:31pm)
- Even keel wrote: Calling By: Refuge (Jul 11 2009 - 8:31pm)
- "In a rare, high-stakes bid By: josh (Jul 11 2009 - 7:50pm)
- Even keel wrote: Not By: Unionist (Jul 10 2009 - 5:16pm)
- Even keel wrote: I think you By: Sineed (Jul 10 2009 - 5:02pm)
- Unionist wrote: I forgive By: Sineed (Jul 10 2009 - 4:47pm)
- I think you all acted as By: Even keel (Jul 10 2009 - 2:30pm)
- The city's offer is now By: writer (Jul 10 2009 - 1:29pm)
- Unionist wrote: If you were By: Caissa (Jul 10 2009 - 9:16am)
- My first summer job just By: Boom Boom (Jul 10 2009 - 9:08am)
- I remember in the bad old By: Unionist (Jul 10 2009 - 9:11am)
- Interesting. NB, PSAC local. By: Caissa (Jul 10 2009 - 8:51am)
- I'm surprised too, Caissa, By: Unionist (Jul 10 2009 - 8:47am)
- Yes, it was the case. There By: Caissa (Jul 10 2009 - 8:45am)
- I would have a HUGE problem By: Michelle (Jul 10 2009 - 8:34am)
- My first summer job By: Caissa (Jul 10 2009 - 8:06am)
- I forgive you, Sineed. But By: Unionist (Jul 10 2009 - 7:27am)
- Le T wrote: This brings By: Sineed (Jul 10 2009 - 6:56am)
- This brings light on By: Le T (Jul 9 2009 - 8:51pm)
I'm no fan of back to work legislation, but unless the City Administration is ready to remove its demands for take-aways and concessions in the contract and reach a negotiated contract, wouldn't the back to work legislation also make binding arbitration mandatory?
What would the likely outcome of government mandated binding arbitration be for the workers?
Would it be the status quo contract? A lesser contract? More or less than the City's latest offer? Or even a better contract than could reasonably be expected to be negotiated?