NDP strategy for the next federal election, whenever that may be. (Thread 2) By: NorthReport (103 replies) July 18, 2009 - 1:12amA Guaranteed Annual Income By: V. Jara (Jul 18 2009 - 9:26pm) Not really. Sweden's VAT By: Stephen Gordon (Jul 18 2009 - 8:42pm) Okay, and since youre bigger By: Fidel (Jul 18 2009 - 8:36pm) In Sweden, labour market By: Stephen Gordon (Jul 18 2009 - 7:49pm) Stephen Gordon wrote:
So By: Fidel (Jul 18 2009 - 7:42pm) Stephen Gordon wrote:
So By: Unionist (Jul 18 2009 - 7:34pm) So giving money to poor By: Stephen Gordon (Jul 18 2009 - 7:33pm) Stephen Gordon wrote:
How By: Unionist (Jul 18 2009 - 7:18pm) That's an interesting By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 7:13pm) How about a Guaranteed By: Stephen Gordon (Jul 18 2009 - 7:03pm) There's no rule saying you By: ottawaobserver (Jul 18 2009 - 7:00pm) NorthReport wrote:
There are By: Fidel (Jul 18 2009 - 7:00pm) Um, has anyone given any By: Stephen Gordon (Jul 18 2009 - 6:51pm) StarSuburb wrote: The only By: adma (Jul 18 2009 - 6:26pm) Starsuburb your cut and By: remind (Jul 18 2009 - 6:25pm) When it comes to Cambridge, By: adma (Jul 18 2009 - 6:04pm) Re: NDP strategy for the next federal election, whenever that ma By: StarSuburb (Jul 18 2009 - 5:56pm) Source? By: George Victor (Jul 18 2009 - 5:26pm) Even evangelical Christians By: Policywonk (Jul 18 2009 - 5:05pm) There are a lot of By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 4:30pm) Don't think either of those By: remind (Jul 18 2009 - 4:27pm) I agree. Yes, use the By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 4:29pm) It was 6th in the country By: ottawaobserver (Jul 18 2009 - 4:16pm) Quote:Valerie Goodyear was By: remind (Jul 18 2009 - 3:38pm) remind, when there is an By: ottawaobserver (Jul 18 2009 - 2:55pm) remind wrote:
The By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 2:34pm) OO, had a look at the By: remind (Jul 18 2009 - 2:22pm) Cambridge, eh!
The NDP By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 3:11pm) adma wrote:
You forgot: By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 2:03pm) I don't know much about the By: ottawaobserver (Jul 18 2009 - 12:28pm) Hmmm that was insightful OO. By: remind (Jul 18 2009 - 12:25pm) I wonder if it might not be By: ottawaobserver (Jul 18 2009 - 11:36am) You forgot: Gatineau's not By: adma (Jul 18 2009 - 7:24am) Thanks OO.
Well if my By: NorthReport (Jul 18 2009 - 2:01pm) I saw that Jack Layton is By: ottawaobserver (Jul 18 2009 - 2:32am)
- Closing for length. By: Maysie (Jul 22 2009 - 12:17pm)
- Despit having said I am By: KenS (Jul 22 2009 - 11:58am)
- Directly contradicting what By: KenS (Jul 22 2009 - 11:54am)
- Stockholm wrote: I predict By: madmax (Jul 22 2009 - 11:46am)
- The potential for the NDP to By: David Young (Jul 22 2009 - 6:54am)
- You have done some good By: NorthReport (Jul 22 2009 - 12:50am)
- I think that's an excellent By: Lord Palmerston (Jul 22 2009 - 12:25am)
- remind wrote: Truth is By: Debater (Jul 21 2009 - 11:35pm)
- remind wrote: I do not see By: adma (Jul 21 2009 - 11:05pm)
- Nice work adma. It'd be fun By: V. Jara (Jul 21 2009 - 10:54pm)
- I do not see Sudbury as By: remind (Jul 21 2009 - 10:06pm)
- I think you've nailed it By: ottawaobserver (Jul 21 2009 - 9:49pm)
- NorthReport wrote:Now, as By: adma (Jul 21 2009 - 9:41pm)
- NorthReport By: Lord Palmerston (Jul 21 2009 - 7:46pm)
- A lot of that already By: Stockholm (Jul 21 2009 - 2:49pm)
- Uncle John wrote: The NDP By: NorthReport (Jul 21 2009 - 2:45pm)
- NorthReport By: Fidel (Jul 21 2009 - 2:26pm)
- IntelligentDesign By: NorthReport (Jul 21 2009 - 2:04pm)
- Why anyone would vote for a By: Stockholm (Jul 21 2009 - 2:00pm)
- Truth is Proulx recovered By: remind (Jul 21 2009 - 1:56pm)
- IntelligentDesign By: Debater (Jul 21 2009 - 1:27pm)
- Hull-Aylmer isn't going to By: IntelligentDesign (Jul 21 2009 - 1:15pm)
- And besides, Canada's By: Fidel (Jul 21 2009 - 12:54pm)
- The NDP is already highly By: Stockholm (Jul 21 2009 - 12:42pm)
- The NDP has strength in By: Uncle John (Jul 21 2009 - 12:27pm)
- This was posted at the same By: madmax (Jul 21 2009 - 11:31am)
- adma wrote:remind By: remind (Jul 21 2009 - 1:39pm)
- remind wrote:Moreover, the By: adma (Jul 21 2009 - 8:02am)
- V. Jara I agree with you, By: NorthReport (Jul 21 2009 - 1:50am)
- Not to rain on your parade By: V. Jara (Jul 21 2009 - 12:52am)
- Thanks Stock, the correction By: NorthReport (Jul 21 2009 - 1:47am)
- "3 NL St John's South-Mount By: Stockholm (Jul 20 2009 - 11:28pm)
- There are polls and there By: NorthReport (Jul 20 2009 - 11:32pm)
- Debater wrote:remind By: remind (Jul 20 2009 - 11:08pm)
- remind wrote: Good example By: Debater (Jul 20 2009 - 10:43pm)
- Another way the NDP could By: V. Jara (Jul 20 2009 - 10:35pm)
- Debater wrote: "I By: Fidel (Jul 20 2009 - 10:40pm)
- Debator Beginning of Sept By: remind (Jul 20 2009 - 11:39pm)
- But you are using last By: Debater (Jul 20 2009 - 10:31pm)
- Yes, the continual trending By: remind (Jul 20 2009 - 7:28pm)
- No sorry, debator, you can't By: remind (Jul 20 2009 - 7:07pm)
- So the Liberals are going to By: NorthReport (Jul 20 2009 - 6:41pm)
- remind wrote: Why is it By: Fidel (Jul 20 2009 - 6:40pm)
- Outremont is a long-term By: Debater (Jul 20 2009 - 6:27pm)
- Why is it symbolic? And By: remind (Jul 20 2009 - 5:57pm)
- remind wrote: Debater By: Debater (Jul 20 2009 - 5:26pm)
- Thanks bekayne, and I have By: NorthReport (Jul 20 2009 - 5:28pm)
- NorthReport wrote: 22 ON By: bekayne (Jul 20 2009 - 5:14pm)
- Debater wrote:Yes, Outremont By: remind (Jul 20 2009 - 5:05pm)
- I prefer the NDP record, and By: NorthReport (Jul 20 2009 - 4:43pm)
- Being aware of it and being By: Debater (Jul 20 2009 - 3:16pm)
- What a surprise. As if the By: NorthReport (Jul 20 2009 - 3:15pm)
- StarSuburb wrote: As great By: Debater (Jul 20 2009 - 3:10pm)
- Harris Decima really plugs By: NorthReport (Jul 20 2009 - 11:28am)
- Cutting taxes for all By: George Victor (Jul 19 2009 - 3:10pm)
- Stockholm wrote: Mouseland By: peterjcassidy (Jul 19 2009 - 1:50pm)
- How about putting taxes on By: V. Jara (Jul 19 2009 - 1:02pm)
- Wrongful conviction. By: Unionist (Jul 19 2009 - 12:20pm)
- Was the mouse actually a By: Gary Shaul (Jul 19 2009 - 12:13pm)
- Mouseland is a cute fable - By: Stockholm (Jul 19 2009 - 9:36am)
- The day the writ is dropped, By: peterjcassidy (Jul 19 2009 - 2:45am)
- On the Alberta front, the By: V. Jara (Jul 19 2009 - 1:48am)
- Unionist wrote: Fidel By: Fidel (Jul 18 2009 - 10:54pm)
- More ways to save money + By: V. Jara (Jul 18 2009 - 10:26pm)
- Stephen Gordon wrote: A By: V. Jara (Jul 18 2009 - 10:22pm)
- Fidel wrote: Is this what By: Unionist (Jul 18 2009 - 10:10pm)
- Stephen Gordon wrote: Not By: Fidel (Jul 18 2009 - 10:07pm)
- A negative income tax and a By: Stephen Gordon (Jul 18 2009 - 9:33pm)
I will predict that Ignatieff will completely and fully rule out ANY coalition. That will score more points then lose.
I predict that Jack Layton will say the NDP are ready for a coalition and that should just about put a nail in the coffin for many NDP candidates looking to win a new NDP seat.
Coalition has become a dirty word. It will reappear in the next election because the Conservatives already see the political merit in pointing it out. They will use it to try to pin both Ignatieff and Layton down.
Jack is still defending his coalition maneuver and the fact that he has to defend it would suggest that this is an issue that puts the NDP on their heels not stepping forward.
The better NDP route would be to maintain working with the parliment that Canadians Form, which by all accounts will be another minority government.
WHile a coalition is a far superior tool then the current Bullshit we see today in parliment, IE a written agreement not to bring down the government is far better then the threat of election every third day, the fact is, people don't understand the value of a coalition and its far to late to explain that after the fact. Its not campaign material.
Therefore I fully and completely expect Ignatieff to say in no uncertain terms... NO COALITION and then after the seat count and the election is over.... a coalition if necessary. :)
I expect the NDP has a strong base, but will spend alot of the next campaign on their heels.
Its hard to promote a party that is viewed in the general public as a party that has been against everything, and exactly what did the NDP accomplish in the last parliment?