Again, you will have to provide evidence as to how I support dictatorial regiemes. Repeating the accussation is just repetition of the slur.

I might just as well say that you are supporting Amedinejad "in effect" by engaging in a "ploy to distract attention" from Amedinejad's Iran by posting a link where Zizek is supporting Amedinejad "in effect" by engaging in a "ploy to distract attention" from Amedinejad's Iran, by talking about Berlesconi and pointing out how democracy in the west is often just as much as a sham as the Iranian democracy.

Such would be nonsense much in line with your nonesense about how I support dictatorial regiemes by talking about the global movement toward toothless democracy backed up by an ever bolder national security state, in the context of Iran.

You could, as an alternate, talk about what I have said, as opposed to innuendo about my real intentions, and various other personal attacks based in my failure to say exactly what you think I should say.