Home
M. Spector
\,,/ rabble-rouser-l33t \,,/
Member: 9273
Joined: Feb 19 2005
August 25, 2009 - 10:35am
#1

Dana Larsen wrote:
The NDP is not Brad Lavigne, nor Jack Layton, and of course it's not me either. The NDP is the members of the party, and they have shown myself and End Prohibition considerable support throughout my challenges with the party. So while it may seem odd for me to be saying this after being banned from the convention, I love the NDP! I believe in the party and I am proud to be a member. Despite the hassles I experienced from Brad Lavigne at the Halifax convention, I still consider the NDP the best party for Canada and the best fit for me.

Some babblers are fond of lecturing Barry Weisleder and the other members and supporters of the Socialist Caucus about how they are wasting their time trying to influence the NDP and how they should quit the party. "Resistance is futile," they chant in unison.

I wonder how many of them would give the same advice to you.


  • Email this comment
Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (105 replies) August 25, 2009 - 2:54am
  • Coyote wrote: Extreme By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 6:11pm)
  • I think all people should be By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 25 2009 - 6:10pm)
  • Ken Burch wrote: And is that By: Pogo (Aug 25 2009 - 6:09pm)
  • I was talking about the By: Ken Burch (Aug 25 2009 - 6:03pm)
  • Honestly, Coyote, whatever By: Catchfire (Aug 25 2009 - 6:00pm)
  • Extreme hostility? From By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 5:54pm)
  • As an outsider, I'd have to By: Ken Burch (Aug 25 2009 - 5:51pm)
  • Dana, I have no clue how you By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 5:41pm)
  • Dana, thank you for your By: ennir (Aug 25 2009 - 4:36pm)
  • Re: Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 3:14pm)
  • I've watched COPS a couple By: Polunatic2 (Aug 25 2009 - 1:52pm)
  • He states that he was not By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 1:49pm)
  • You seriously think it is By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 1:39pm)
  • Quote:I know this much: I By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 1:30pm)
  • M. Spector wrote: Some By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 1:25pm)
  • Dana explaining the videos By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 12:56pm)
  • Have you looked at his By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 12:40pm)
  • I am singling out for By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 12:13pm)
  • You are obviously singling By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 12:06pm)
  • I think it is obvious that By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 11:34am)
  • But you haven't explained By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 11:12am)
  • I'm saying that I would want By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 11:04am)
  • Are you suggesting that Dana By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:53am)
  • SO not what i meant. I mean By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 10:44am)
  • Coyote wrote: I know this By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:37am)
  • Dana Larsen wrote:The NDP is By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:35am)
  • I know this much: I would By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 10:33am)
  • Brad Lavigne By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:26am)
  • Thanks for the report Dana, By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 10:16am)
  • thanks Unionist - what I By: janfromthebruce (Aug 25 2009 - 9:55am)
  • The snipets of debate I By: Caissa (Aug 25 2009 - 8:34am)
  • Quote:13. A motion may be By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 8:26am)
  • And to be the "devil's By: janfromthebruce (Aug 25 2009 - 8:05am)
  • Thank you so much for this By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 7:36am)
  • Re: Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 3:16am)