ottawaobserver
rabble-rouser-supreme
Member: 15981
Joined: Feb 24 2008

remind wrote:

Respectfully OO, there is no way in hell Dana's video had anything to do with it.

My point about voters staying home, and perhaps even voting  in Green Nanaimo Alberni and VIsland north stands.  I would safely bet the majority of NDP supporters in both ridings are pot smokers, at the least. 

I know it's not true that the majority of NDP supporters in Nanaimo-Alberni are pot smokers, and I doubt it's true in Vancouver Island North.  NDP voters did not overall switch Green in Vancouver Island North in 2008, as Catherine Bell held her raw vote almost to a person from 2006, and she had picked up most of the remaining Green vote back then.  New Green voters came from disaffected Liberals in that riding.  Maybe 600 NDP voters abandoned the NDP for the Greens in Alberni; not enough to win by a long stretch.

remind, Dana's video offended pot smokers too, you know.  Apart from modelling behaviour that is unsafe to oneself and others on the public roads, it was braggartly.  And I think if we consult with even the most progressive pollsters, we would find that that incident had a big impact on helping disaffected Liberals decide not to vote NDP.

But I'm guessing we move in very different circles to come up with such differing perceptions.


Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (105 replies) August 25, 2009 - 2:54am
  • Coyote wrote: Extreme By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 6:11pm)
  • I think all people should be By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 25 2009 - 6:10pm)
  • Ken Burch wrote: And is that By: Pogo (Aug 25 2009 - 6:09pm)
  • I was talking about the By: Ken Burch (Aug 25 2009 - 6:03pm)
  • Honestly, Coyote, whatever By: Catchfire (Aug 25 2009 - 6:00pm)
  • Extreme hostility? From By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 5:54pm)
  • As an outsider, I'd have to By: Ken Burch (Aug 25 2009 - 5:51pm)
  • Dana, I have no clue how you By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 5:41pm)
  • Dana, thank you for your By: ennir (Aug 25 2009 - 4:36pm)
  • Re: Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 3:14pm)
  • I've watched COPS a couple By: Polunatic2 (Aug 25 2009 - 1:52pm)
  • He states that he was not By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 1:49pm)
  • You seriously think it is By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 1:39pm)
  • Quote:I know this much: I By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 1:30pm)
  • M. Spector wrote: Some By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 1:25pm)
  • Dana explaining the videos By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 12:56pm)
  • Have you looked at his By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 12:40pm)
  • I am singling out for By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 12:13pm)
  • You are obviously singling By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 12:06pm)
  • I think it is obvious that By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 11:34am)
  • But you haven't explained By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 11:12am)
  • I'm saying that I would want By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 11:04am)
  • Are you suggesting that Dana By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:53am)
  • SO not what i meant. I mean By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 10:44am)
  • Coyote wrote: I know this By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:37am)
  • Dana Larsen wrote:The NDP is By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:35am)
  • I know this much: I would By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 10:33am)
  • Brad Lavigne By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:26am)
  • Thanks for the report Dana, By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 10:16am)
  • thanks Unionist - what I By: janfromthebruce (Aug 25 2009 - 9:55am)
  • The snipets of debate I By: Caissa (Aug 25 2009 - 8:34am)
  • Quote:13. A motion may be By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 8:26am)
  • And to be the "devil's By: janfromthebruce (Aug 25 2009 - 8:05am)
  • Thank you so much for this By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 7:36am)
  • Re: Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 3:16am)