genstrike
rabble-rouser-machine
Member: 16179
Joined: May 1 2008

Dana Larsen wrote:
More Canadians support drug policy reform than currently vote NDP, so it would seem like a vote-winner to me.

One problem is that political strategists don't care about people.  They care about only one person:  the elusive middle Canadian.  This person is invariably white, male, middle class, middle income, residing in a medium sized city, in a middle income suburb, middle of the road politically, with a white picket fence, 2.3 kids, and some very traditionalist and conservative economic opinions.  This man doesn't like change or vision, he doesn't want to rock the boat, and he doesn't give two shits for the poor or victims of oppression.  Trust me, I've seen an NDP government take a right-wing position which >75% of the population opposed.  But the middle Manitoban (or at least his representatives in the Winnipeg Free Press and the Chamber of Commerce) wanted it, so it was done.  It doesn't matter if a left-wing idea is popular, we must be careful not to scare the elusive middle Canadian.

Personally, I've never met this guy, although I read the media speaking on behalf of him.

And this middle Canadian doesn't like things which are different.  He finds it scary.  And since you're different, you must be banished for you might scare the hypothetical middle Canadian so much that he might not leave the boundaries of his hypothetical white picket fence and vote for The Party.


Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (105 replies) August 25, 2009 - 1:54am
  • Coyote wrote: Extreme By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 5:11pm)
  • I think all people should be By: kropotkin1951 (Aug 25 2009 - 5:10pm)
  • Ken Burch wrote: And is that By: Pogo (Aug 25 2009 - 5:09pm)
  • I was talking about the By: Ken Burch (Aug 25 2009 - 5:03pm)
  • Honestly, Coyote, whatever By: Catchfire (Aug 25 2009 - 5:00pm)
  • Extreme hostility? From By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 4:54pm)
  • As an outsider, I'd have to By: Ken Burch (Aug 25 2009 - 4:51pm)
  • Dana, I have no clue how you By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 4:41pm)
  • Dana, thank you for your By: ennir (Aug 25 2009 - 3:36pm)
  • Re: Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 2:14pm)
  • I've watched COPS a couple By: Polunatic2 (Aug 25 2009 - 12:52pm)
  • He states that he was not By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 12:49pm)
  • You seriously think it is By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 12:39pm)
  • Quote:I know this much: I By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 12:30pm)
  • M. Spector wrote: Some By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 12:25pm)
  • Dana explaining the videos By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 11:56am)
  • Have you looked at his By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 11:40am)
  • I am singling out for By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 11:13am)
  • You are obviously singling By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 11:06am)
  • I think it is obvious that By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 10:34am)
  • But you haven't explained By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 10:12am)
  • I'm saying that I would want By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 10:04am)
  • Are you suggesting that Dana By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 9:53am)
  • SO not what i meant. I mean By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 9:44am)
  • Coyote wrote: I know this By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 9:37am)
  • Dana Larsen wrote:The NDP is By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 9:35am)
  • I know this much: I would By: Coyote (Aug 25 2009 - 9:33am)
  • Brad Lavigne By: M. Spector (Aug 25 2009 - 9:26am)
  • Thanks for the report Dana, By: remind (Aug 25 2009 - 9:16am)
  • thanks Unionist - what I By: janfromthebruce (Aug 25 2009 - 8:55am)
  • The snipets of debate I By: Caissa (Aug 25 2009 - 7:34am)
  • Quote:13. A motion may be By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 7:26am)
  • And to be the "devil's By: janfromthebruce (Aug 25 2009 - 7:05am)
  • Thank you so much for this By: Unionist (Aug 25 2009 - 6:36am)
  • Re: Dana's NDP Convention Report By: Dana Larsen (Aug 25 2009 - 2:16am)